Posted on 09/29/2018 11:43:27 AM PDT by bolobaby
I cannot understand the contradiction: Cruz must go, but RINO's however can only be opposed in the primaries.
I suppose the answer is that there are two factions here on the forum. Perhaps the issue of voting for the lesser of two evils is a rational decision, but the hatred for Cruz is irrational and emotional?
Any correction and contradiction is greatly appreciated!
Here’s the polygraph guy himself. He states there were two questions asked while she was hooked up to the machine.
You see they could have used that as a chess piece, give us the full results, audio, video report of polygraph and we will go with the FBI investigation. NO, their lawyers said no, and we didn’t enforce that demand. They know we will cave and move on, they know how to fight like a pit bull.
But knowing them, they would have stalled and the rino’s would still have refused to vote for him without the FBI. This is where we suck.
Why didn’t Kav have his lawyer next to him helping, saying were not going to answer that, helping the Judge? Was it his own decision to do it alone? It was a bad idea. Lawyer could have said asked and answered or guided him on his replies regarding drinking, passing out, black outs.
Will the FBI interrogate the person who did the pplygraph? Or is this investigation just all on Kav or not her?
Agree. I was a Cruz supporter too. But NOBODY except DJT could have survived the 99% media assault 100% of the time as Trump did, and still does, relentlessly.
I am not all upset this weekend. Trump is going to win this one too!
People should stop watching TV news including FOX. OAN okay.
OH, I was not for Cruz, but we need him to win in November.
Vote people, and stop the crying.
The FBI will talk to the “examiner,” but remember who paid his bills. He won’t say anything to incriminate his clients or Ford. The DNC wouldn’t take a chance on somebody they couldn’t trust. So far, we’ve seen one witness and one statement that wasn’t paid for by the DNC, that would be Kavanaugh’s testimony and his statement.
He explains that it was only two questions because she was “the victim”.
...”The polygraph was performed at the airport hotel where she was returning home from attending her grandmother’s funeral. Between admitted flight anxiety and death of a family member, what medications was she taking?”...
It was provided and paid for by her lawyers who sent that person to her from some distance on the day of that funeral, a really odd and strange deal. And, we are chastised to think this was a left-wing conspiracy. In my opinion, that is exactly what it was and is.
AND SHE SAID SHE CRIED A LOT.
From a meme:
Ford: “I kept crying during the polygraph”
That would create false positives, degrading the accuracy and reliability from 70-90% to less than 20% Yet, she still ‘PASSED”??????
If this is true it should be headline on Drudge.
The outcome of the polygraph is not the only problem. She took a polygraph that has no legal standing whatsoever, publicized it, before she formally submitted anything to the Judiciary Committee. That’s telling right there. She was trying to try Kavanaugh in the press as much as possible and avoid taking any legal action of any kind.
just curious, did you get a response to your direct question over an hour ago?
Only your query.
Whinging about your butthurt from two years ago will not win you any friends or sympathy, pal.
No one wants to hear your repressed memories of what the mean ol' Freepers did to you way back when, and how you're still traumatized about it.
Send it in a letter to Diane Feinstein.
Provide a link to even one post where any Freeper has called for Cruz's defeat in November, or retract that slander.
If you call a Freeper out by name, you're supposed to ping them to your post.
Flake caves because he is at heart a Democrat.
“Cruz still gets dumped on, daily, on FR, even now... including calls for him to be defeated in NOV.”
I think you’re confused. Name even one FReeper who’d rather have Beto win instead of Cruz.
I’ve heard that a more reliable method of detecting lying is analyzing a subject’s voice. It would be cool to have one of those investigators evaluate Dr. Fraud’s testimony and weigh in on it.
Of course, whatever drug she was on could impact those results, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.