It is Sylvia Adkins Randall who has a business address at 3872 Duncan.
Of course, in California regulations are minimal and I assume the business use of a private residence in Palo Alto without appropriate permits is no big deal, right?
And I assume whoever signed a mortgage application declaring 3872 Duncan as their home and primary residence, occupied by a single family, told the truth, right?
The bank wouldn’t revoke a mortgage over a little fib like that, would they? The city won’t mind about the lack of an occupancy permit for a business either, right? Anybody can make a mistake.
And, of course, I presume Sylvia Adkins Randall and Christine Blasey Ford are two different people, right? No one would apply for a professional license in California with a fake or assumed identity, would they? And even if they did, all that would happen is that State would simply correct the oversight and issue a new, proper license.
Right?
And if someone were billing Federal health programs using someone else’s NPI number and identity, well, as long as they were trying to help other people, that would be fine, right?
CBF could not be Dr. Sylvia.
She is not a licensed clinical psychologist. She has a PhD in Educational Psychology and works in academia.
You fail to understand the Martyr of Palo Alto has permanent immunity. You are taking about pursuing criminal prosecution of a Saint of the CHurch of Gaia. You are lucky we let you keep your head.