Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Engedi

Grasslwy hired the LESBIAN Marshmallow Sex PROSECTOR.....to go after Kavanaugh!! Luckily Linda Graham stepped in and saved the day!


9 posted on 09/30/2018 4:37:54 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Ann Archy
Grasslwy hired the LESBIAN Marshmallow Sex PROSECTOR.....to go after Kavanaugh!! Luckily Linda Graham stepped in and saved the day!

You're completely off-base with your criticism of Rachel Mitchell. She did an excellent job of showing the holes in Ford's story, exposing how she was manipulated by Feinstein and her activist lawyers, and getting Judge K on the record under oath refuting every single allegation of Ford.

I guess you wanted fireworks, but that wasn't her job and doesn't appear to be her style. But if you go back and review everything she did, you'll see an impressive amount of damaging information to Ford. I'll put a sample from the transcript concerning the polygraph with key points bolded below all this.

What you'll see is Ford claiming how stressful the polygraph was and Mitchell getting her to admit the time and place were chosen by her lawyers, and it just happened to be the day or the day after the funeral of Ford's grandmother. Gee, you think that was just a coincidence to schedule it after a very emotional event so that Ford would be really compelling in describing being upset during the polygraph? Makes for great theater until you understand why she was upset. And you think it's a further coincidence that Mitchell just happened to ask about it being the day of her grandmother's funeral? You'll also note Mitchell further establishing how the process was controlled by the RATS and the lawyers by asking who paid for it and Ford having no idea.

A lot of the questions that Mitchell appeared to be just asking were actually deep cuts into Ford's story and how she was being handled. Again, you and a lot of other people seem to feel fireworks were required for the questioning to be effective. That's just not the case. Rachel Mitchell got a tremendous amount of information out that was helpful to Judge K.

None of what I'm saying, though, means I wouldn't also like to see Ford roasted for her obvious lies and the RATS roasted for using her as a pawn. I hope we see the day where she is prosecuted using what Mitchell brought out and with the fireworks that you and the others would like to see. I also hope to see the day where the RATS are bashed with what Mitchell brought out and similarly with the same level of fireworks.

FORD: Based on the advice of the counsel, I was happy to undergo the polygraph test, although I found it extremely stressful, much longer than I anticipated. I told my whole life story, I felt like, but I endured it. It was fine.

MITCHELL: I understand they can be that way.

Have you ever taken any other polygraphs in your life?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: OK. You went to see a gentleman by the name of Jeremiah Hanafin to serve as the polygrapher. Did anyone advise you on that choice?

FORD: Yes, I believe his name was Jerry.

MITCHELL: Jerry Hanafin.

FORD: Yeah.

MITCHELL: OK. Did anyone advise you on that choice?

FORD: I don’t understand the — the — yeah, I didn’t choose him myself. He was the person that came to do the polygraph test.

MITCHELL: OK. He actually conducted the polygraph, not in his office in Virginia, but actually, at the hotel next to Baltimore Washington Airport. Is that right?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: Why was that location chosen for the polygraph?

FORD: I had left my grandmother’s funeral at Fort Lincoln Cemetery that day, and was on tight schedule to get a plane to Manchester, New Hampshire, so he was willing to come to me, which was appreciated.

MITCHELL: So he administered a polygraph on the day that you attended your grandmother’s funeral.

FORD: Yeah, correct.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: Or it might have been the next day. I spent the night in a hotel, so (inaudible) the exact day.

MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: And I don’t just mean countermeasures, but I mean just any sort of tips, or anything like that.

FORD: No. I was scared of the test itself, but was comfortable that I could tell the information, and the test would reveal whatever it was going to reveal. I didn’t expect it to be as long as it was going to be, so it was a little bit stressful.

MITCHELL: Had — have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: OK. Did you pay for the polygraph yourself?

FORD: I don’t — I don’t — I don’t think so.

MITCHELL: OK. Do you know who did pay for the polygraph?

FORD: Not yet, so.

MITCHELL: Did — you — you have the hand-written statement that you wrote out. Did anyone assist you in writing that statement?

FORD: No, but you can tell how anxious I was by the terrible handwriting.

MITCHELL: Did you — we — we touched on it earlier. Did you know that the committee has requested the — not only the charts from the polygraph test, but also any audio or video recording of the polygraph test?

FORD: No.

MITCHELL: Were you audio- and video-recorded when you were taking that test?

FORD: OK, so I remember being hooked up to a machine, like, be — being placed onto my body, and being asked a lot of questions, and crying a lot. That’s my primary memory of that test. I don’t know — I know he took laborious detail into explaining what he was going to be doing, but I was just focused on kind of what I was going to say, and my fear about that. I wasn’t listening to every detail about the — what — whether it was audio- or video-recorded.


18 posted on 09/30/2018 5:26:23 PM PDT by Dahoser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson