Posted on 11/06/2018 6:42:55 PM PST by TheConservativeParty
Fox is so bad I am watching CNN for election results.
Now it’s an hour after I turned off Fox and just now CNN is saying perhaps the house might go to the dems. So why did Fox say this an hour ago. They should not guess. They should wait for results and report the results.
now it’s 98 versus 111 for pubbies
Fox is run by Murdoch’s two eunuchs and their lib feminist wives.
—
Yep!
So why do so called conservatives keep watching that krap?
Because of Hannity? (Who is second rate on my book, but a nice enough fellow)
Dana and Juan are the worst. They also had freakin’ Marie Harf on! Gimme a break.
Channel 1208 on ATT Uverse.
“You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest,” Pelosi detailed, “and then you merchandise it.
And then you (gesturing to the media) write it, and then they say, ‘See, it’s reported in the press that this, this, this, and this.’
So they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it’s called the ‘wrap-up smear.’”
Media collusion? substitute the above phrase, wrap up ‘smear’ with wrap up ‘media interference in Our Election’?
Oann.com
CNN has much better election coverage.
My blood pressure is level watching these guys.
No I am not under the influence of anything.
I’m mighty tired of Fox and the entire lot. Gonna abandon all and stick with FR for info.
I have not trusted Fox for many years. They are horrible. Seem to want to lose every viewer.
True enough. I left them years ago, I can’t even remember the year I quit watching. I think it was the year that ED Hill disappeared without a trace. I quit watching.
The Hannity show everyone seems to love never interested me (and he lets libs run wild waaaay too much) is there anything else on Fox for a REAL conservative? I didn’t think so.
CNN has always been better at breaking news. Fox is amateur hour.
What Fox reported as fact an hour ago was totally a guess, and yes it was a media interference in the election.
No Fox has nothing. Lou Dobbs on the business channel is still great.
Yes, there’s a lot of Pubbies out there that need the vote. So calling it early depresses the vote for those Pubbies.
I don’t think I ever heard Chuck Todd speak. He sounds like a total goofball. Like he is faking a voice. Muted in self-defense.
they started mixing their pre election “interviews” of 125000 americans, and their own analytical specialists thoughts, with the results as they come in... and have been doing no exit polling.
They have projected that the dems are likely to take the senate at 81 percent probability... when there is virtually NO CHANCE of that happening.
The idiots are taking a ‘pulse for our last few weeks of interviews and analysis’ instead of reporting the results as they come in from the polls... to me, it looked like they were shocked that they had to call Kentucky and Florida races for the pubbies and it seemed visibly apparent.
This is a big mistake on their part... in my not so humble opinion.
ALL Polling was off before the last election.. whether you call it ‘analysis from interviews’ (aka polling) or not; its used to call races early and influence california and the west to not vote... and it won’t work. Hey, fox dumb asses, we all voted early!
you heard wrong. sorry to say.
pubbies have thus far had fox call them at 118 and dems at 108.
Not much of a tsunami... is there Fox Morons?
IF fox were right, pubbies have 122
Dems... 111
who gets to 238 first? is a guess, but the pubbies are in no way out of it. no way.
thanks MottTheHoople, when I was a kid, that was you know... a “thing”... :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.