[logi_cal869]

Back atcha, but it's not a noble effort if it's hyperbole or exaggeration. The other side can espouse propaganda; I don't need DS blowing smoke up my kilt's backside.

Case in point, this 3 foot wall marking Pelosi's vineyard property.

[Songcraft]

Nice try.   Nancy Pelosi said that "a border wall is immoral", not just a border wall taller than 3 feet, or 5 feet, or 10 feet, just "a border wall".   She does have a border wall on that property, and probably on many of her other ten or more fancy homes and other properties she has here and there.

Your picture is obviously from a remote end of her huge vineyard, but let's take another quick couple looks at that same Pelosi vineyard property, at different parts of it, and different angles.

Anyone who tries to claim that a wall like that cannot provide protection, is quite simply, ignorant, and 100% wrong.   It could be electrified, and most likely has various triggers for intruder alarms, as well as video observation and recording devices, and possibly a bunch of inaudible alarms for badass guard dogs, as well as possible alerts for some armed guards, and who knows what else.   Believe me, you don't want to try to breech any of Pelosi's residential walls, or trespass on any of Pelosi's walled properties illegally, otherwise, you probably won't be around anymore to post anything.

You can deny it over and over again, but the actual truth is, Pelosi's house walls and her perimeter walls are both there to protect her and her property.   I'm done arguing with you about this.   If you can't see that simple fact, too bad.