I have found that National Enquirer stories have at least a kernel of truth. They often push more legitimate (?) news sources to investigate.....like with John Edwards and his mistress. I always notice the Enquirer headlines, while at the checkout line in the grocery store.
I would never have thought I would say this, but I put far more credence in a National Enquirer story than in a story published or reported by the Washington Post, the NY Times, CNN, etc.
In part, that is because they seem to have people working for them who might qualify as real journalists, who know how to find out what’s actually going on. The subject matter may be on the sleazy side, but they didn’t cause the story, now did they?
Most of what passes for “news” is opinion. There is a constant drumbeat of “Trump lied” without any substantiation; this story, apparently, gives details (who, when, where).
Way back in the day - The National Enquirer also was the first to print rape allegations about Clinton and first break Al Gore’s phony jet-setting lifestyle and his divorce.
Its probably because they are considered lurid and low-class, that America’s progressive governing class doesn’t bother propagandizing them.
I’m surprised...it took eleven posts before John Edwards was mentioned...another Leftist sleazebag.
Rielle Hunter is probably kicking herself over not having waited for the billionaire.
Good on ya for refreshing our memories.