Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ann Archy

Why did this woman go public with this story? She showed terrible judgment in doing so. Her daughter’s privacy was invaded.


5 posted on 01/31/2019 9:02:40 AM PST by utahagen (but but)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: utahagen

And then she puts her kid’s PICTURE on the WORLD WIDE WEB!!~! DUMBASS!


10 posted on 01/31/2019 9:04:43 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: utahagen

Perhaps she noticed some behavior for which she wants to blame the “real father”.

What are the odds she elected to birth this child because of gender?

Pretty good, I’d say.


20 posted on 01/31/2019 9:11:15 AM PST by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: utahagen

She’s trying to whip up a sympathetic lynch mob to try to force the sperm bank to change its policies.

Her vague, emotional plea is nothing but PR. They don’t say what relative she approached, but by calling it a relative, it is clear that it is NOT the donor.

She did DNA testing for her child. That is reasonable and within her rights. What was wrong was contacting the donor’s relative and bringing up the sperm donation. For all we know, she told his mother, his sister, his child that he was a sperm donor ... that person talked to the donor, who then contacted the sperm bank.

I have male relatives I wouldn’t be surprised to find out had illegitimate offspring and found me on a DNA site, but that would literally be between us. However, the donor in this case AND the recipient had an agreement to be anonymous.

You don’t get to violate the contract you signed years later and use the kid as the excuse. That’s why they took back the sperm and threatened to sue for damages. The woman decided to use anonymous sperm, and she’s now trying to use emotional blackmail to say I don’t have to honor the contract after I got what I wanted.


44 posted on 01/31/2019 9:24:39 AM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: utahagen

Yep. Terrible judgment from the get go

This woman is all about herself, and using the child as a prop


76 posted on 01/31/2019 10:04:54 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat ("Mods/Indies/Dems/Non-voters" JOBS or MOBS? Are CRAZY DIMS REALLY who you want BACK in POWER?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: utahagen

Twice now she has over stepped the privacy and legal boundaries.
Then she acts like a victim and contacts the media to try and guilt trip the donor. Because that is what she is doing. Rationalizing and guilt tripping.

Using her daughters photo shows just how little common sense she has. She had no business having any other children with this behavior.

I’m sure she’s been banned from every donor bank around.


135 posted on 02/01/2019 2:55:53 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson