To: jospehm20
The article doesn’t give any numbers, so how high is it? 150/80? What’s the big secret?
8 posted on
02/08/2019 4:08:55 PM PST by
Ken522
To: Ken522
In an emergency hypertensive crisis, your blood pressure is extremely high and has caused damage to your organs?
16 posted on
02/08/2019 4:12:42 PM PST by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll eventually get what you deserve)
To: Ken522
“The article doesn’t give any numbers, so how high is it? 150/80? “
I’ll take 600/450 for this stool sample.
26 posted on
02/08/2019 4:19:52 PM PST by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Ken522
Not high blood pressure.
Hemp rope poisoning administered via Military Tribunals that are going on.
59 posted on
02/08/2019 4:46:49 PM PST by
eartick
(Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
To: Ken522
Probably over 180/100 which is usually medical emergency territory.
78 posted on
02/08/2019 5:26:50 PM PST by
struggle
To: Ken522
Probably over 180/100 which is usually medical emergency territory.
81 posted on
02/08/2019 5:28:44 PM PST by
struggle
To: Ken522
Believe or not 150/80 is not considered high.
99 posted on
02/09/2019 12:10:22 AM PST by
jmacusa
("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
To: Ken522
150/80 isn't an "emergency." Actually, in 2013, the AMA raised the level of "high" blood pressure to 150/90. Then in 2015 the feds funded the Sprint study which said 130 systolic was high. Suddenly, half of America had high blood pressure.
But the study had one group they kept at systolic of 140. Another group they kept at 120 systolic. The interesting thing was that statistically, for all practical purposes, the number of cardiac events in both groups was essentially the same. There was no real benefit in lowering the systolic number.
107 posted on
02/09/2019 8:52:23 PM PST by
LouAvul
(The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson