Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: StolarStorm
I have to like Armageddon.

I can't get past the bad science. I very much prefer "Deep Impact".

http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/01/nasa-uses-the-movie-armageddon-in-their-management-training-program/

Today I found out that NASA uses the 1998 film, Armageddon, in their management training program.

It turns out, to absolutely no one’s surprise, that this is not because it’s an incredibly well thought out movie in how to stop an asteroid from hitting the earth… No, they use it because it contains over 168 distinct things that are impossible (not just improbable, but impossible. there are many many more if you want to talk about improbable). Because of this, it makes for a great exercise in seeing how many of those things their staff can recognize, both the impossible things and the improbable.

.......

Phil Plait said it best “Here’s the short version: Armageddon got some astronomy right. For example, there is an asteroid in the movie, and asteroids do indeed exist. And then there was… um… well, you know… um. Okay, so that was about all they got right.”

30 posted on 02/21/2019 8:54:36 PM PST by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Simon Green

LOL! That’s great! My father complains more about the Gravity movie being inaccurate. When I visit, I do not watch space related movies with him... not if I want to enjoy them.


31 posted on 02/21/2019 8:58:41 PM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson