There are several like him. They claim that they have arrived at their opinions independently. Here is another one that had a HUGE following on Twitter until they banned him for being to dangerous for the left. So he went to another Twitter like forum.
https://social.quodverum.com/@REX
And here is list of very articulate articles that some of these guys have written. Totally non Q.
On Military Tribunals.
Now lets assume that at the very least there was this huge plot by government officials to take out Donald Trump. What about the Clinton’s selling government secrets? Extremely classified emails(SAP) on Hillary’s hacked server that she had no business even having(How did she even get them?). Pay to play in the Clinton foundation. Collusion in all branches of the DOJ to cover up those crimes. The entire U1 Scandal.
You might even agree with some of that based on the news. Wouldn’t some of that amount to Treason? How do you try cases of treason by government officials? How do you keep a corrupt judge and a bunch of leftist jurors, and lawyers(and the media) from throwing the trial?
One possible answer might not seem so crazy even if it is hard to grasp. A person is not crazy to at least consider the possibility. Remember when they asked Judge Kavanaugh in his confirmation hearing if he supported military tribunals. Why would they ask him that?
It is wild to think that this forum was founded on the Clinton corruption(White Water). Maybe the time has finally come.
The issue is not whether the criminals in the demparty and the deep state are guilty and belong in prison. Of course they do. And I hope the new AG agrees and prosecutes aNd imprisons them.
The issue of trying civilian US citizens who are not unlawful combatants is well settled. There is NO likelihood at all that any tribunals are going to be used on any political figure. Period. It violates the law and the Constitution. That is just one of many idiotic notions that these conspiracy nuts don’t understand and will never accept. Never. They would rather believe anonymous kooks who invent a game for money than consult people who actually know the law.
Nothing undermines legitimate desire to prosecute criminals like Hillary, etc more than crazy conspiracy nonsense.
Some of the writers you mentioned know that. That is why they will not be identified with this totally discredited nonsense. Some of theses folks are minor pundits, some make a few buck on advertising but all of them are smart enough not to be thought of as nutwads. Unlike some of our FRiends who will believe till they’re dying day. Regardless of the evidence.