I will.zay cover up outright, and your complete idiot diatribe completely ignores that to this day the government never provided to the defence of any defendant the complete recordings of the event.
Under the Brady law, they are required to do that. Period. No equivocation.
This isn’t a misunderstanding.
This isn’t overwhelmed.
That’s not a mistake.
If you bother to go back to the articles published the third day after the event, eye witness testimony was contradictory as to how things started and who did what initially. Eyewitness testimony was consistent, however that long after the shooting stopped and the scene should have been declared secure law enforcement was still not allowing medically trained personnel who happened to be on scene tender aid to the wounded.
People bleed out who didn’t have to die.
There is a reason that those recordings were suppressed even though that meant that the guilty must go free with the innocent.
I strongly suggest that you spend some time with a dictionary.
Look into the history of the term “cover up” and how it is normally used.
After that, you might want to reevaluate whether or not this was one.
No, the formula is modified, limited hangout. Which is a cover up.