Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
This is actually an interesting legal question. Should a property owner be entitled to destroy items belonging to a tenant if both understand that the items are prohibited?

The porn was not illegal, so there's no requirement that the parents destroy it. But it was made clear to the son that it would not be tolerated in the house.

However, since the son was in effect a paying tenant -- doing work in lieu of cash rent -- he had all of a tenant's rights, including a right to privacy.

I suspect the court will decide in favor of the parents, but I'd be interested to know the judge's rationale.

3 posted on 04/14/2019 7:33:54 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack

He sounds like a pervert, Jim.


5 posted on 04/14/2019 7:37:08 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

I don’t know what the law says but if his father told him if he brought porn into his house he would destroy it then his father is on pretty firm ground!!!


15 posted on 04/14/2019 7:48:41 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

He left it behind when he vacated. Whatever you leave behind can be disposed of by the landlord.


18 posted on 04/14/2019 7:56:27 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack
I suspect the court will decide in favor of the parents

Highly doubtful.

The landlords destroyed $29K worth of their tenant's personal property without his knowledge or consent. Their aversion to the character of his belongings is a moot point. They had no right to do what they did.

The court is going to find for the tenant.

45 posted on 04/14/2019 8:57:46 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

Any moral context aside, I suspect the judge will ask several questions. The first of these was he staying at their residence with a written agreement, and did that agreement, oral or written, specify labor instead of payment for his tenancy?

Since he was married, the assumption was that he was legally an adult, and no longer under his parent’s supervision.

That he was in possession of something which was forbidden by his parents, their legal action was to kick him out, not to destroy it. Legally it doesn’t matter what it is. So by destroying his property, whatever it is, they are open to liability for its value.


46 posted on 04/14/2019 9:06:53 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Desperate swarm sewage drains for water..." Venezuelans or D.C. Swamp denizens?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

MY house——MY rules.


56 posted on 04/14/2019 10:05:51 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

Wait until the creep gets a look at his parents new will.


57 posted on 04/14/2019 10:13:41 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

if this is an old collection with pre 1976 movies there is a good chance some of the porn has under age participants. enforcement of laws prohibiting those who were under age was spotty at best and most movie porn was produced over seas and shipped in to the united states from Sweden and Denmark with the bulk being under age. the best result probably it being destroyed.


93 posted on 04/14/2019 8:14:22 PM PDT by PCPOET7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson