Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CondoleezzaProtege
Sounds like The Observer might be a subsidiary of Airbus.
3 posted on 05/17/2019 12:18:45 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Bill Barr:The Bill Belichick of Attorneys General)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

Personally I believe this would be best Boeing’s long term health.


4 posted on 05/17/2019 12:21:50 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

Sounds like The Observer might be a subsidiary of Airbus.


If you read the article as well as research the subject you would see that they actually presented a complicated subject not only fairly but in a way most should be able to understand.

When this all first came up, I (not knowing anything about planes or about the history of the 737) did a little research.

I was surprised to discover that the 737 is a very old aircraft (design). Boeing began making changes, which caused problems which then required more changes and so on.

It is now an airplane that no longer matches the design of the original.

So while I am not an engineer it is clear (to me) the current design for the 737 Max is flawed and may be beyond fixing (without causing more problems and more deaths).

If Boeing does not ground the aircraft the lawsuits will, especially if there is another crash.


13 posted on 05/17/2019 12:36:18 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson