[humblegunner]

You may not admit it, but your opinion was come to by taking in information about Trump and what he's done and is all about.
Where did you get that data input, Mr Roboto?

Observation of the world.
Hillary is Hillary and Trump is Trump. Both known quantities.
No prompting required.

Let's face it. You rarely venture an opinion.

Y'all not worthy.

Millions of people were convinced to vote for her, though. How did that happen?

Were you "convinced" to vote for Trump?

We are currently in a world-wide information and propaganda
war to sway and form "public opinion", which in turn can affect what
Trump and his people will be able to do to eliminate our enemies.

Tom Clancy meets Matrix meets Game Of Thorns.

Actually, on some microscopic scale I'm sure your point is valid.

But you've admitted none of that bunk swayed you in the least.

[bagster]

Observation of the world.

What form did your "observation of the world" take?

I submit to you that you absorbed data about both Hillary and Trump over time. And you didn't do it by osmosis or mental telepathy. You did it by "observing" facts and opinions presented by others, or "individual facts and opinions".

Were you "convinced" to vote for Trump?

Of course I was. I was convinced by watching, looking, and listening. And by a lifetime of doing the same for derpocrats and Hillary. It's all part of the signal. Denying that is foolish.

Y'all not worthy.

Agreed. But I won't waste my time on this earth keeping my opinion to myself. You have a good brain and good opinions. Don't let 'em go to waste. Try helping make the unworthy, worthy.

Tom Clancy meets Matrix meets Game Of Thorns.

Absolutely.

Life imitates art. Or vicey-versey, I forget which.

But you've admitted none of that bunk swayed you in the least.

Did I?

I'm not arrogant enough (close) to think that I form opinions all on my own without any input.