Posted on 05/25/2019 1:15:05 PM PDT by Monrose72
Police officers across the country are celebrating Theresa May’s resignation, having been thoroughly alienated by the Prime Minister in her previous role as Home Secretary under David Cameron. Theresa May presided over massive cuts to police budgets and manpower during her tenure, and made “taking on” the Police Federation which represents rank and file officers up to Chief Inspector one of her signature stances — although she seemingly enjoyed a more collegial relationship with politically correct senior officers, such as Metropolitan Police chief Cressida Dick.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
But to the point of this - anyone, ANYone will be better than Theresa May.
She was really bad as a home minister - incompetent, arrogant and stubborn — and she did the same as PM.
The Muslim problem is Britain’s own. They invited many Mirpuri Pakistanis in the 70s and 80s to work in the UK. They never integrated. hindus and sikhs and christians from the subcontinent integrated and even muslims from other parts integrated somewhat. This is part of the UK’s legacy of supporting Islam (for the UK’s benefits) since the 1500s:
1. Queen Liz 1 was in talks to ally with the Turks (against the common enemy - the Spanish). note: the French had done the same or did the same in the 1600s against the Hapsburgs.
2. in the 1600s with the Mughals who were too powerful for the European powers
3. in the 1800s with the various imams, mullahs etc.
4. In the 1900s with the Saudi family
They took in various muslim fanatics against the secular dictators in the ME. The French did the same btw. And then the chickens came to roost.
This is not caused by the EU, but by internal decisions centuries in the making
True...but at least when they did it then, they were up front and honest about it. Hard to deny that when a British Naval Armada is pulling up to the beach with advanced weaponry and all you got is some sharp sticks.
Now, these fukcers lurk in the shadows and do things like get fraudulent FISC warrants or whatever else they call them around the world.
Something to think about....Halper, Downer, etc may have been rogue, acting on behalf if Brennan/Clapper. But, what if their part was actually, officially sanctioned by their government and/or their country’s intel apparatus? For Britain, there’s a chance that May didn’t know what was going on? She proved herself to be an globalist, idiot that was in way over her head. If MI6 was doing something on the Low-low, doesn’t mean that she knew about it. But, then again maybe she did. Maybe she allowed this to go on because she is a globalist or is controlled by those that are. Then we have the Italian PM, maybe, cleaning up a mess because some of their intel folks played a role. Then an legitimate Australian diplomat is part of it. Whether he was sanctioned or not, by his government, anything and everything he does is done under the authority of the Australian government.
If any or all of that is true, then, some of the most powerful governments on the planet and their misfits tried to undo an election.
WTF are the implications of that? How do you even begin to repair that? You could be talking, if Barr is legit, that a lot of folks are going to have warrants and extradition requests to the US.
I don’t know enough of spygate to comment. I only know that Maybot was and is incompetent and she’s been that way since 2010. Her character hasn’t changed - she’s incapable of creating a conspiracy (not smart enough)
It seems to me that the West always backs the wrong horse when it comes to muslim’s and the Middle East in general. Anyone that has spent any time around them or in the region, realizes pretty quick that the leadership has to lead with a pretty heavy hand. The secular ones are raised knowing that if you don’t take care of the zealots, even though they are as corrupt and greedy as anyone, you’re going to lose. But at the same, they tend to keep the peace and their citizens live in relative peace.
What happens, these secular leaders are beat down for their aggressive style, removed or killed and are then replaced by theocratic, BS, islamic zealots, who are treated with kid gloves, out of respect for the peaceful religion of islam. And they are exponentially more brutal than their secular predecessor, but all of that is forgiven because we don’t understand them the way we should.
I’m not saying she created it. But, in line with her incompetency:
1. Her puppet masters told her to cooperate with the dem’s, brennan, clapper, fbi, etc and she authorized British intel to take part in the fraud.
2. She’s that incompetent that British intel did whatever they wanted to do and she was none the wiser.
Either way, she should have a lot to answer for, but she never will. As it will be a lot of...I don’t know...I can’t recall....Had no idea..so on and so forth.
Exactly. The West’s failures in my opinion have been
1. The Venetians redirecting the fourth crusade to attack constantinople - weakening it and allowing the Turks to conquer it 250 years later
2. the alliances of France and Calvinist Hungary with the Ottomans against Austria at the siege of Vienna
3. The alliances of Catholic France, Anglican UK with the Muslim Ottomans against the Orthodox Russians in the Crimean war of 1853
4. The playing and abetting of the Wahabbi-Saudi alliance against the Hashemites (ancestors of the king of Jordan and hereditary rulers of the Hejaz (Mecca and Medina))
5. Gulf War one
You don't need British police anymore. You let the moonbats in and now you have sharia police instead. Enjoy.
Admittedly, I’m not as learned as you seem to be on that history, but I know enough to say that...
While the first three events you listed, may have set the stage for centuries to come, the last two events have exacerbated the problem. Hard to think about all the problems and death associated with all of that.
I’d also throw in there, again I’m not a historian, Carter doing everything possible to get rid of the Shah. They said the Shah was brutal. Ok. I think, more than anyone, he knew what he was up against, who he had in prison and why they were there. Ever since then, they have done their level best to destroy the world around them.
The thing about iran is that it predates the Shah — the democratically elected and very popular Prime Minister mossadegh was booted out by the Brits as he threatened to end their oil monopoly. This led to the Shah taking dictatorial control and the start of Iranian animosity to the west
So what you’re saying is, the Globalists(in this case the US and UK), who have been around for centuries, took out Mossadegh because he tried to free Iran from outside influence and let Iran control it’s own fate. Do I have that right?
If so, then it’s absolutely no different than what the US, UK and the other countries they involved in taking out Qaddafi and destroying Libya.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.