Interesting the glaring omission - they don’t mention even the possibility the cadet may pose a danger to others. Just himself. Someone “missing”, armed with a rifle. Hm.
“Interesting the glaring omission - they don’t mention even the possibility the cadet may pose a danger to others. Just himself. Someone “missing”, armed with a rifle. Hm.”
This is massing above but was in the original article: “Authorities don’t believe the cadet has any magazines or ammunition or poses a threat to the public. He may be a danger to himself, the military academy said in a statement.”