To: LibWhacker
one example they give in the paper equates to 10214857091104455251940635045059417341952, which is a very, very, very big number. Actually, one of the smallest numbers there is. Admittedly, one the largest numbers you will ever encounter, but there are infinitely more numbers larger than it, and only a finite number smaller.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
“If the result is correct...”.
There’s only one correct result to two numbers multiplied. How will they know it’s correct?
13 posted on
10/22/2019 3:38:35 AM PDT by
Rennes Templar
(Heaven has a wall and gates. Hell has open borders.)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Actually, there are an infinite number smaller as well.
27 posted on
10/22/2019 5:26:25 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Actually, one of the smallest numbers there is. Admittedly, one the largest numbers you will ever encounter, but there are infinitely more numbers larger than it, and only a finite number smaller. But one will always be the loneliest number.
42 posted on
10/22/2019 7:50:23 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Now that’s a beautiful example of how sometimes pedantry can be utterly hilarious!
Well done, sirrah!
46 posted on
10/22/2019 10:20:33 AM PDT by
Don W
(When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson