No, they don’t. :-)
What they have is a mishmash of acts of Parliament, conventions, and court rulings.
They lack a formal, written constitution that protects the citizenry from its government.
They desperately need one.
::What they have is a mishmash of acts of Parliament, conventions, and court rulings.
They lack a formal, written constitution that protects the citizenry from its government.::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But they still consider all of that precedent protection of their rights. And they refer to it as a constitution.