and, women were among the first explorers - so much for patriarchal suppression.
The “Naharon” skull is female and pointing to Alaska and Greenland - Greenland is closely associated with Vikings. But Greenland is nowhere near Alaska. “The Pit” skull points to Europe; Besides the UK, Normandy is also a Viking conquest. This find could change history all by itself.
But wait, there’s more - we have the “Las Palmas” skull, linking Asians and native americans, which could be expected, while the last skull, “Muknal”, links Artic population to ‘modern SA populations’. How did Artic pointing man end up in Central America, bypassing the ‘asian’ and ‘indian’ elements altogether??
When you add in the Mayan legend that their blue-eyed, blond ‘gods’ came on the sea from the east and disappeared the same way...We’ve got Vikings or Europeans up and down the landmass from Iceland to Tulum, Mexico to Brazil? Argentina? Chili?
It boggles.
“When you add in the Mayan legend that their blue-eyed, blond ‘gods’ came on the sea from the east and disappeared the same way...We’ve got Vikings or Europeans up and down the landmass from Iceland to Tulum, Mexico to Brazil? Argentina? Chili?
It boggles.”
Absolutely... There was once a very viable and possible trade route from Hudson bay to the great lakes and down the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico. And possibly even at the end of the Neolithic Period.
There have been prismatic spear points found in east coastal Panama knapped in a particularly unique style that can only be found in one other place in the world, Scandinavia...
Do they have material to use for DNA studies?