Not very perceptive at all. The book really has nothing to do with the fact that the girl is Latin American, her immigration status, or anything else, but is simply a depiction of a very common problem among powerless young women...whether victims of international human slavery, runaway kids (probably fleeing sexual exploitation by a family member) or psychologically vulnerable people.
Interpreting it as an attack on Latin American culture is ridiculous, because this is certainly not a part of Latin American culture.
And btw, why wasn’t the NYT and the rest of the gang out there supporting Trump on his newAnti-Human Slavery initiative. But I guess since Epstein and Dem friends had been enjoying and profiting on the human slavery, the Times could not possibly acknowledge this.
The "perceptive" part was in regards to conservative comments like in my post above (such as by two called "really!" and "Bhekaron").
Not very perceptive at all.
*****
And what it’s aimed at, and hoping to accomplish, is open unfettered immigration, which would serve no purpose other than to bring the exact horrorshow, that the illegals claim to be running from, right here to our own neighborhoods.
When a leftist is yanking on your heartstrings, it’s only ever to get you to comply with your own destruction because Feelz!
The author’s sin in the eyes of liberals is being a privileged white woman writing about illegal immigrant girls of color.