1 posted on
03/23/2020 8:03:22 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
03/23/2020 8:04:04 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
An attosecond is a LOT shorter than an “in a second”.
Amazing stuff!
3 posted on
03/23/2020 8:12:27 PM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: BenLurkin
Great post! I have been debating what to teach my 10 year old since school is out for the rest of the year! Particle physics is interesting!
4 posted on
03/23/2020 8:17:29 PM PDT by
gr8eman
(Stupid should hurt! Treason should hurt more!)
To: BenLurkin
Would Heisenberg be OK with this?
6 posted on
03/23/2020 8:26:29 PM PDT by
sasquatch
To: BenLurkin
The dynamics of electrons change ever so slightly on each interaction with a photon. Physicists at ETH Zurich have now measured such interplay in its arguably purest formby recording the attosecond-scale time delays associated with one-photon transitions in an unbound electron."An attosecond is 1×10 −18 of a second (one quintillionth of a second). For context, an attosecond is to a second what a second is to about 31.71 billion years."
Can any human being really conceive of this time-span?
7 posted on
03/23/2020 8:26:55 PM PDT by
henbane
To: BenLurkin
The researchers measured a delay of up to 12 attoseconds between outgoing s- and d-electrons in helium. That's some superb measuring.
An attosecond is to a second what a second is to 31.71 billion years.
8 posted on
03/23/2020 8:32:46 PM PDT by
TChad
(The MSM, having nuked its own credibility, is now bombing the rubble.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson