[Prolixus]

Bottom line:

The claims that are not dismissed and that remain are:

(1) Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Franks claim against Defendants Stroman, Lanning, Reyna,
Chavez, Rogers, Schwartz, and Frost;

(2) Plaintiffs’ conspiracy claims against Defendants Stroman, Lanning, Reyna, Chavez,
Rogers, Schwartz, and Frost;

(3) Plaintiffs’ bystander liability claims against Defendants Stroman, Lanning, Reyna,
Chavez, Rogers, Schwartz, and Frost;

(4) Plaintiffs’ Pembaur claims against the City insofar as they relate to the surviving claims
against Defendant Stroman.

SIGNED this 31st day of March 2020.

[easternsky]

Thanks so much for the update ,much appreciated

[KarlInOhio]

I didn't know who was who so I found the list of names and positions on another site.

Waco Police Chief Brent Stroman;
Waco police detective Manuel Chavez;
McLennan County prosecutor Abelino “Abel” Reyna;
Waco Assistant Police Chief Robert Lanning;
former Waco Police detective of the year and local gang expert Jeffrey Rogers:
Waco Police Public Information Officer Patrick Swanton;
Texas Department of Public Safety Criminal Investigations Division Lieutenant Steven Schwartz;
and Department of Public Safety Special Agent Christopher Frost.

[Spktyr]

Just to remind everyone, Waco has *still* refused to release the full ballistics or autopsy results from the original incident. They’ve actually dismissed cases they claimed were open-and-shut rather than produce them. It smells to high heaven.

[Gay State Conservative]

Later

[Stanwood_Dave]

I'm not a schooled trained attorney, I don't play one on TV or YouTube.

Have been to my Washington State Supreme Court 4 (four) times, Civil Matter's, (made case law 3 out of 4, all on the losing side of trying to form New County{s}) and I'm up on my "42 U.S.C. § 1983" claim's, with that as a backdrop, I give this judge many prop's he know's this will be going up the ladder, I agree with most of his finding's, I'll just mention Ruby Ridge, Randy Weaver, and that of what is called "A Complaining Witness," when the (Judge touches this via another case, but I believe he drop's the ball in this regard.) The Implied Immunity Defense, does not support a TRUTH DEFICIT Disorder, response (A.K.A. When A Cop etc., Lie's to get an A Warrant) was up held by the 9th, Circus no less. Also pointed out by the judge in this case via a 5th circuit decision, but on slightly different grounds.

Yes I know based on the Order signed by the Judge {Alan D. Albright,} that ruling's from the 5th circuit are controlling in this matter.

I'm hoping the lawyer's in this case will do some basic legal research, now that they been allowed to open the door so to speak.