“There is a lot of evidence to support secession being regarded as accepted in 1787, and very little which shows otherwise.”
If you have never read Charles Francis Adams Jr’s speech “Shall Cromwell Have a Statue?” you should try to find it on the internet. It’s hard to find, someone ought to reprint it, in html if nothing else.
Anyway you’ll see Adams conclude that the Confederacy had a case for secession, based upon “the old understanding” of the nature of the federal union. Lincoln chose to pretend that “the new understanding” of the federal union was the only view that existed. And nowhere was that new understanding enshrined in law. Lincoln simply imposed the new view via bayonet.
Confederacy bashers don’t like Adams’ essay at all, I suspect that is the reason it’s so hard to find. He’s inconvenient because in addition to having been a Union combat officer he’s the grandson and g-grandson of the two Massachusetts Presidents. Instead of dismissing him as a Lost Causer from Dixie they have to actually deal with his research and reasoning in the matter of secession. So they don’t.
Yes, this claim that secession is illegal, is a made up phony piece of work imposed by Lincoln, but unsupportable by actual law or history.
http://www.wyomingtalesandtrails.com/Shall_Cromwell_Have_a_Statue.pdf