Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Home buyer stuck with $38,000 water bill from previous owner
CTV News ^ | July 9, 2020 | Pat Foran

Posted on 07/10/2020 11:36:11 AM PDT by rickmichaels

TORONTO -- A Thornhill, Ont. resident said he was stunned after receiving a water bill last month for close to $38,000.

“I nearly passed out. I thought where am I going to get the money to pay that bill," Kenny Wong said, speaking to CTV News Toronto.

Wong said he bought the property in February and he received the bill in June.

“It’s $38,000 and that's the outstanding water bill from the previous owner," Wong said.

Wong explained that on closing the deal for the property, his lawyer didn't check to see if the utility bills were paid in full. The home was vacant for a year and a half and he now believes a water pipe must have burst while the home sat empty.

“I called Alectra Utilities and they said due to privacy reasons I’m not entitled to know anything [about the previous owner] which is really frustrating, but they are demanding I pay the $38,000 outstanding."

Wong feels the utility companyshould have known something was wrong and questioned why a bill would get that high.

“Why didn't they do anything about it? I mean that is really, really off the charts to add up to those kinds of dollars," Wong said.

When CTV News Toronto reached out to Alectra a spokesperson explained that they tried to collect the money from the the seller, but were unsuccessful.

“Mr. Wong was not informed about the water account arrears until the sale had closed," the spokesperson said. “It is the purchaser’s responsibility to ensure they understand any costs and arrears related to the property they are buying.”

Wong did purchase title insurance and has filed a claim hoping it will cover the cost of the bill. Alectra has now assigned an agent to Wong's s case and hopes the two sides can reach a reasonable resolution.

The most common reason for high water bills in the GTA is a running toilet. A single leaky toilet can waste more than 900 cubic metres of water in a month creating a water bill of more than $2,600.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 07/10/2020 11:36:11 AM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

If he was using an attorney, I’m sure the attorney would be happy to pay this. It’s cheaper than a lawsuit.


2 posted on 07/10/2020 11:38:10 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Malpractice by his lawyer and fraud by the previous owner. He should not even consider paying it.


3 posted on 07/10/2020 11:38:21 AM PDT by DilJective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

In a normal country, personal unpaid water bills do not pass on to the next owner. Property taxes, yes. But not water bills.

But Canada is NOT a normal country.


4 posted on 07/10/2020 11:39:03 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Click my screen name for an analysis on how HIllary wins next November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

I was wondering about title insurance but I don’t think this would affect the title - yet.


5 posted on 07/10/2020 11:39:19 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Wouldn’t this show up in a lien check? If not, wouldn’t the obligation be on the former owners, not on the property?


6 posted on 07/10/2020 11:39:57 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

38,000 bucks is a LOT of water over six months.

If the lawyer missed the bill check, he’s the right party to collect from. Or, I should say, his insurance. Not the title insurer, not any home warranty. The buyer assumed all obligations under advice from his lawyer that there weren’t any.


7 posted on 07/10/2020 11:40:21 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

But Canada is NOT a normal country.


Oops. I missed that. Never mind. Canada is like a meth head that has only been using for a few weeks. It “looks” normal, but it’s really something else.


8 posted on 07/10/2020 11:41:02 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

This is a title insurance or attorney problem. I wouldn’t allow the insurance company or attorney’s problem become my problem.


9 posted on 07/10/2020 11:41:21 AM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

No burst water pipe. Neighbors hooked up to whatever spigot was available and helped themselves. The open water line was never shut off by the municipality after the previous owner vacated. Dollars to donuts lots of folk have been getting free water in the interim.


10 posted on 07/10/2020 11:41:36 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

OK, as I thought. This is NOT a water bill.

Keep looking at that picture. Everywhere you look you see “tax”. I sorta suspect Canada water bills are a sort of government agency with tax collection abilities.

Good thing Wong had a title company. They should have caught this.


11 posted on 07/10/2020 11:42:10 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Click my screen name for an analysis on how HIllary wins next November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

That’s just wong.


12 posted on 07/10/2020 11:43:09 AM PDT by steadcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Sue the lawyer. He/she was paid for due diligence. They punted.


13 posted on 07/10/2020 11:43:11 AM PDT by Drango (1776 = 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Normal bill close to $2k.


14 posted on 07/10/2020 11:43:14 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

I had an attorney hold up closing on a $56 refund I had coming on the common septic assessment. “I don’t care about the $56” I said. “I need to do this,” she said.”This could be malpractice.”


15 posted on 07/10/2020 11:44:05 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Something is seriously Wong here...?


16 posted on 07/10/2020 11:45:04 AM PDT by Leep (We can go to the grocery store but we can't go to work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Seems to me his lawyer is stuck with a $38k water bill.


17 posted on 07/10/2020 11:45:30 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
Someone at the title insurance company probably didn't do their due diligence. This is the type of thing that they are paid for.

“For the average real estate transaction, checking for any utility liens or unpaid bills on a property is simple. The title company performs a title search to show any liens filed against a property in the public record. If they find any, the seller will have to satisfy them before the closing. They will also request a final meter reading prior to closing to see if there are any outstanding balances that have not yet become liens.”

“The utility balance along with other unrecorded municipal debt and issues is found when a full municipal lien search is ordered by the title company or law firm handling the closing. At closing, the seller gives the settlement agent their new address to send the final water bill. Once they receive the final bill, they usually pay. On the rare occasion that the seller doesn’t pay the small amount left, it’s added to the new owner’s bill.”

But this can be a problem for foreclosures and bank owned properties.

“Often times, bank owned properties will not have the water and electricity on. This makes it nearly impossible to do a proper home inspection, which is highly recommended for all buyers to conduct. If a seller is resistant to turning on the utilities so you can perform an inspection, it’s a red flag that there may be some major hidden issues. Many banks will perform an inspection upon acquiring the property, so they may share this document with you. However, it may not be up-to-date and reflect current unpaid balances as was the case for the woman in Fairport.”

https://www.proplogix.com/blog/is-a-new-homeowner-responsible-previous-utility-bills

18 posted on 07/10/2020 11:48:12 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Tell the water company that its their problem because they continued to provide service to a non-paying customer.


19 posted on 07/10/2020 11:48:18 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

The attorney most likley has “Errors and Omissions” coverage. In my mind this should be on the attorney.


20 posted on 07/10/2020 11:49:18 AM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson