Posted on 08/27/2020 8:54:39 AM PDT by EBH
CLEVELAND (WJW)– The U.S. Marshals recovered 25 missing and endangered children over the past 20 days as part of Operation Safety Net.
The children, between the ages of 13 and 18, were located in Cleveland, East Cleveland, Akron, Mansfield, Euclid, Willoughby and even Miami. According to the Marshals, about one fourth of the cases were related to human trafficking or prostitution.
Operating Safety Net involves the U.S. Marshals, the Cleveland Division of Police, the Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Department, the East Cleveland Police Department and the Newburgh Heights Police Department. It’s also a partnership with FOX 8 News.
Anyone with information on missing kids should call the U.S. Marshals tip line at 1-866-492-6833
There are just a LOT of these cases going on out there. Good work Trump et al.
Thank God for the US Marshals, good job!
The Federal government sticking its nose in again./s
Liberals think that accountability is a bad word and a worse requirement... something Conservatives dreamed up just to annoy and challenge progressives.
They are way too stupid, lazy and immature to admit that ‘accountability’ is how the world works....PERIOD!
Trump: "Is that a bad thing?"
Once in a while some Q nonsense is bound to be right, just by dumb chance.
ping to another interesting event
(read it here. will not be reported on MSM)
“Once in a while some Q nonsense is bound to be right, just by dumb chance.”
—
‘Q’ue the monkeys on the typewriters post
remembr most of these will be non custoial parent spending tine with their child or delivering the child back late from an authorized visit.
I saw a meme the other day that stated President Trump is the first president to actually fight human trafficking. It’s hard to believe....on second thought, maybe not.
And most of them will end up running off and going missing again
As much as I hate to admit it.. the story rings of Q.
“Once in a while some Q nonsense is bound to be right, just by dumb chance.”
Chance isn’t dumb.
You’re referring to statistics. Not being flip here. The one thing about the Q folks is they are not looking for you to believe anything. At all.
Q, whoever they are, drops something cryptic. Regular people go out and do their own research. They draw their own conclusions, and then they preface it with ‘now do your own research and come to your own conclusions’.
You reference, correctly, statistics. You essentially reference something on the order of ‘a stopped clock is right twice a day’. Again, this can be true.
However, and this threshold is different for everyone, there comes a point where the coincidences pile up. They become interrelated.
Evaluate everything, then draw your own conclusions, and trust only you on it.
I’ve looked into the Q thing. I hope a lot of what they are foreshadowing happens. However, some of it is clear, well-documented, and compelling. Some of it is tenuous and subject to some tortured pattern discernment.
But there is a lot of it. More than a lot of it. Enough not to dismiss it out of hand.
Be skeptical, but be curious.
It's the same trick psychic mediums use to fool people. Say a bunch of general things, let the mark pick some to fill in his own details. He'll think you predicted it. It's classic stuff and one of the giveaways that Q is BS.
"However, some of it is clear, well-documented, and compelling."
Some of what? Has Q made a non-cryptic, specific, unlikely, prediction that proved out? Great. What was it?
"Be skeptical, but be curious."
Certainly. But you might want to look into that skeptical thing.
Great job. Child sex trafficking needs to be stopped.
Apparently a good number were also really bad people.
Some of the evidence compiled by regular people. I was spent some of my career doing interrogations. I’m trained in elicitation techniques. I know exactly how a mentalist does what they do.
You haven’t done your homework. That’s fine, but it also means you’re speaking from a position of relative ignorance. Like an atheist, who claims God doesn’t exist.
God may or may not exist, which is to say most people are agnostic - don’t know one way or the other.
You are claiming that Q is a sham. Fine, present the evidence.
And that’s the irony. Q’s not saying anything. Q seems to suggest. People research. You review it. Some of it is pretty good, and some is tenuous.
For me, I don’t know what to think of it, except I’m impressed by the evidence compiled as a result of these Nostradomic drops. For 1/3 of it, there is more than smoke there. For a 1/3 of it, it’s tenuous. The other 1/3 I don’t get.
So if your position is Q is illegitimate, then make your case and we’ll all come to our own conclusions about it.
thanks for letting me know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.