But back to the company. Whenever I have had to hire security for a family event, I contacted a company, signed a contract, and paid the company. The company assigned the guards, and the company paid the guards. I did not get to choose who came to the event. If the news station chose Dolloff without contracting with Pinkerton, then Pinkerton can rightfully claim they never authorized him to act in the capacity of a guard employed by Pinkerton in that event. He was on his own.
Whenever I have had to hire security for a family event, I contacted a company,...Man, I’d like to come to one of your family reunions!!!
We will see how this plays out but the lawyers are going after the deep pocket all the way up and down the line.
Gotta finish this.
“Pinkerton, the security company 9News said it contracted with for the protest”
Why would the media station say this if it were not true. It does not lessen their liability in any way.
Why would you assume that what they clearly stated may not be true. This kinda stinks of bias on your part.
Pinkerton is on the hook if they specifically assigned this guy to work for the station yesterday, and can't prove he has the appropriate licensing. If he took the job without Pinkerton knowing about it, and was working independently, then the station should be held accountable, because they didn't check to see if he had the appropriate paperwork.