RE: My sisters rheumatologist told her that she used this treatment on one of her other patients and he was basically cured in four days.
Here’s the problem — skeptics are arguing that EVEN WITHOUT HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE, these patients would have recovered on their own anyway. There’s no way of disproving this.
RE: My sisters rheumatologist told her that she used this treatment on one of her other patients and he was basically cured in four days.
~~~~~~~~~~
Heres the problem skeptics are arguing that EVEN WITHOUT HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE, these patients would have recovered on their own anyway. Theres no way of disproving this.
== == == == ==
Then, the argument back to skeptics is to have THEM prove that this inexpensive, relatively harmless medicine does NOT work. They cannot, so....allow the medicine to be prescribed.
Also, I think there are numerous studies and examples, showing how HCQ HAS worked, to show the skeptics.
The owness to ‘prove efficacy’ can work both ways, to these ‘skeptics’.
My main philosophy in all this is we don’t need some BS vaccine for a virus that has safe cure medicines. As you point out some don’t even need the medicine.