1 posted on
12/08/2020 11:02:54 PM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
But now, the definition reads, “Court packing can tip the balance of the Supreme Court toward the right or left.” …This is an excellent example of the fallacy of "Begging the Question."
My retort would be: "What 'balance?'"
Regards,
2 posted on
12/08/2020 11:07:51 PM PST by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: Olog-hai
Winston Smith is hard at work.
3 posted on
12/08/2020 11:36:43 PM PST by
SanchoP
("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." )
To: Olog-hai
this is half truth bs
the very point of court packing is to tip it the way one wants it tipped, BY ADDING MORE SEATS AND FILLING THEM WITH PEOPLE THAT ARE YOUR POLITICAL PATSIES
but the normal act of appointing justices to open seats by a president is NOT court packing, that is normal vacancy filling
5 posted on
12/08/2020 11:44:24 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Olog-hai
Lincoln was the best example. He added a tenth justice.
To: Olog-hai
The left is not capable of honesty. It’s not in their DNA.
7 posted on
12/09/2020 12:14:47 AM PST by
benvec
To: Olog-hai
The definition of fascism changed to associate it with “right wing” and make it PC to call Republicans fascists.
8 posted on
12/09/2020 2:56:12 AM PST by
gattaca
("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson