Posted on 03/30/2021 8:27:40 AM PDT by ransomnote
Thank you to Fractal Trader for finding the article I review below while researching the content in the following thread.
I'm going to post some information from the article Fractal Trader found first, and decided not to post, while tracing the path back to the UK.GOV article linked above.
I am not familiar with the the UK website, The Daily Expose, and 'expose' in the title of the blog doesn't ensure validity, but we report data from official sources, too).
The article content I'm sharing did link to the reliable UK.gov report in Fractal's thread, and references data in the UK version of standard CDC VAERS type software.
It's important to know that since the 'vaccines' are just being introduced these past few months, the overall numbers of lost pregnancies are very low, but they are so much higher than normal (percentage increase), it's likely to increase rapidly as more receive it. Often in animal trials negative effects start showing up 3 - 6 months after Covid 'vaccination'.
I'll post some CDC snippets below and summarize a few of the article comments where relevant.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BY ON MARCH 21, 2021 •
The authors of The Daily Expose article wondered why pregnanant women were receiving the Covid 'shots' in the first place.
I'll reword the author's text around the charts so I don't have to keep quoting.
Based on the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme data as of January 24, 2021, a total of 4 women had suffered a miscarriage as a result of having the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
As well as a total of 2 women losing their unborn child as result of having the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.
Between January 24, 2021 and March 7th, there has been a 475% increase in the number of women who have lost their unborn child after having the Pfizer vaccine, bringing the total to 23. This is devastating.
Sadly there's 1 report of a premature baby dying after the mother had the Pfizer vaccine. This could have happened as a result of other factors, but we need to watch and take note to try to head off any needless loss of life.
I understand that MHRA Yellow Card Scheme contains observed data (date of the event, description of adverse reaction) and not causal data (which relies on years of biomedical analysis to determine if other factors were entirely or partly responsible for the event), but we must make use of what we observe because it's all we have right now, and it would reckless to wait for extensive research to be completely.
The UK.gov and the CDC and Co. are steering us onto the rocks. Both the US and UK system reflects adverse events like lose pregnancies, which are not receiving adequate attention.
The AstraZeneca 'shot' is also reported to have observations of lost pregnancy events. Between January 24, 2021 and March 7th, there has been a 150% increase in the number of women to suffer a miscarriage, bringing the total to 5.
Unfortunately, 1 still birth was reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme after the mother had the AstraZeneca vaccine, but for some reason this has not been labelled as a fatality
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Daily Expose decided to investigate how lost pregnancies were occurring in relation to Covid-19 'vaccinations' given UK.gov's advice to pregnant women.
Here's an excerpt:
"Well we started digging and found that the Government has since updated it’s original advice to the following –
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Pregnancy
There is limited experience with use of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women.
Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy,
embryo/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development. Administration of
the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential
benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah, the old risk vs. benefits excuse to recommend the fake vaccines. This is particularly egregious since we're all being bathed in purported 'benefits' and starved of objective information about 'risks'.
I've seen lost pregnancies listed in the US version (VAERS) of the UK's tracking softare. Below is a screen capture of the CDC's advice (3/29/2021) to pregnant women in the United States.
Note the CDC defers to a pregnant woman's 'personal choice' whether or not to get the 'vaccine'. Isn't that favoritism in the work place requiring employees to get the 'vaccine'. ( I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO GET THE VACCINE. My comment about favoritism is a play on the Woke-ism driving people from employment)
Information about COVID-19 Vaccines for People who Are Pregnant or Breastfeeding | CDC
All those pushing this 'vaccine' on an uninformed public use the absence of sufficient data to prove it's a good product and to deny it's a bad product. 'Limited' current data on a technology with 16 years of failure (dead animal trials etc.) becomes the Good Housekeeping seal of approval, or the CDC/UK.GOV seal of approval.
We have to advocate for ourselves. Demand the truth and ask the unpleasant questions of doctors and public health officials (local to federal).
The following image was taken from FReeper defconw's link to a large .jpg collection of social media posts detailing negative experiences. I dont' recall if there was more than one from a pregnant woman, and again, these are just observations, not the results of 10 years of medical study.
The following post includes defconw's montage of all the social media reports combined in one image file (.jpg). Below her link, I broke the images up into smaller pieces which can be read in a single column.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3942345/posts?page=1999#1999 (freerepublic.com)
Bill Gates would say that’s not a bug, that’s a feature towards cutting down on overall global population.
The above woman conceived via IVF?
That is a factor to consider too...just saying.
An extra bonus for liberals... even more dead babies.
One of the proteins that the gene therapy shots cause the body to attack is identical or very similar to a protein used in forming the human placenta. Women who are already pregnant may miscarry; others of child-bearing age will still conceive but will never develop a proper placenta, dooming the resulting embryo.
Why would someone get a vaccination while pregnant?
Could someone do something about this flood of rabid, festering pile of anti-vaccine feces? It’s getting very tiresome as well as boring. Only the brain dead buy this crap.
“we must make use of what we observe because it’s all we have right now, and it would reckless to wait for extensive research”
What would be reckless would be to look only at the increase in miscarriages as more people are vaccinated and not compare the rate of miscarriages by those who took the vaccine to the rate of miscarriages among the general population as a whole.
Many meds and vaccines carry warnings that pregnant women or those co sidering becoming gpregnant should avoid them. Apparently this vaccine may need one as well
Because they’ve been subject to gaslighting.
Time Wil. Tell however, as the stats are run to determine if the vaccines are actually causing g them or some other factor. Need more info. Before jumping to conclusions
Notice how they are careful to say “pregnant people” throughout the article.
As if women aren’t the only ones who can be pregnant. Pathetic.
Or maybe it’s the brain-dead who buy into the glories of a mandatory vaccine against a disease that, for most, is highly-survivable.
I suspect massive cancer spike among the vaccinated.
This guy didn’t lose a baby, but look.
https://www.mystateline.com/news/virginia-man-suffers-rare-severe-reaction-to-covid-19-vaccine/
All part of ‘The Plan’..........................
More posts to make Freeper vaxxers and Covidistas angry. It’s amusing.
What if pregnant women were provided with the most recent CDC VAERS report, or for that matter all considering the 'vaccine', prior to signing a consent form?
What if the CDC/UK.GOV acknowledged that fetal life has more rapidly dividing cells and more sensitivity to injections of materials which modify genes?
What if 'public health' officials like Biden or Cuomo (okay, Fauci, too) protected unborn life, and that of the mother and father and simply banned the availability of the 'vaccine' or at least banned pregnant woment from having it, and communicated the risks clearly for a change?
I believe you speak of Syncytin-1, which entered the genome of old world primates via infection with a retrovirus. The animals, including humans, used part of the endogenous retrovirus’ DNA for benefit. It does have some similarities to the coronavirus spike protein.
This very issue was brought forward by Pfizer’s former head of vaccine development. That was months ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.