Posted on 04/26/2021 9:46:28 AM PDT by delta7
The incident was reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Recording System (the USA’s version of the MHRA Yellow Card scheme in the UK) on the 4th April by the clinician who had attempted to save the life of the baby just a couple of weeks earlier.
The report (which can be found here using VAERS ID – 1166062) details that the mother of the baby received a second dose of the Pfizer jab on the 17th March whilst at work. But the next day her five-month-old breast-fed infant developed a rash and was inconsolable. The baby refused to eat and developed a fever.
The Doctor who made the report describes how the mother brought the extremely ill child to the local Emergency Room where assessments were carried out. It was discovered the baby had elevated liver enzymes. The infant remained in hospital for treatment but tragically declined and passed away just two days later on the 20th March 2021.... The five-month-old baby also developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. This is a condition that results in blood clots forming in small blood vessels throughout the body. This in turn results in a low platelet count and low red blood cells due to their breakdown. This then often causes kidney, heart, and brain dysfunction. This is the very condition which has been proven to be caused by the AstraZeneca viral vector “vaccine”. So it now looks like we have evidence the Pfizer jab can cause the same ailment.
A quasi-dead virus makes for a very different vaccine than a messenger RNA vaccine. What gives people pause is that the code that would be delivered via the mRNA vaccine would then cause our own cells to first make the spike protein and then generate the immune response to that protein. If there were a vaccine for Covid-19 that used an attenuated virus, many of those that you term ‘AntiVaxxers’ would get the shot.
why should anyone believe anything that the cdc, fauxi, and the scientific community says about a so called “deadly virus” when they refuse to speak up about the dangers of our feral government opening the border, inviting, and then distributing thousands of disease carrying invaders across our country during a so called “global pandemic”???...
Not in that Mom’s age group they aren’t.
The risks from the vaccine are not yet known, the trial group is being injected, we will know more in 2-5 years.
The problem is that too many people believe in authority figures no matter how many are shown to be BS artists & ignoramuses and there are not enough doubting Thomases & skeptics.
I signed at least three documents with each shot.
They went over the list of things I should be aware of. Having fine masculine breasts, they left out the “pregnant and or breastfeeding” part.
But if you are getting anything done with a vaccine...and you don’t sign something, you are not at a good place. Don’t go back there.
Hungary is using Pfizer, Moderna & the Russian Sputnik vaccine. The Russian vaccine is more effective and having less adverse effects.
“ FDA received 1,170 reports of death among individuals in the U.S. who received a Covid vaccine
Well known to be under-reported
But as the poster I responded to claimed - “10x times as many died from bees.
So your gripe isn’t with me since it wasn’t my claim.
Problem is that we can’t prove they saved even one life. Why aren’t we comparing them against Vitamin prophylaxis, against Ivermectin?
There is an increased chance of catching the variants after you are immunized. Immunized people that contract COVID have a worse prognosis. This millions saved is hype since many were probably naturally immune, many would have had subclinical cases and many vaccinated are contracting COVID. Anyone who postulates a risk benefit analysis that is clear cut is buying the narrative.
“I f these vaccines save a million lives while they cause one death then they can be seen as worthwhile.”
Unless it is you, your son, your daughter, your parent, etc. who died.
Perhaps you can contact them to tell them it was worth it?
And we will not have an accurate assessment of other negative mRNA consequences for 18-36 months.
We’ll see.
“So you think that this previously healthy infant had been damaging her liver with alcohol & drug use?”
********************************************************
I didn’t say one word in the post you commented on... I merely posted verbiage from the thread’s linked site.
Usually it is assumed that the copied & pasted material is relevant. Otherwise why post it?
Then why do they ask the question, “Are you breast feeding?” before they jab you?
The worse part about the Pfizer C-19 vax is that it will make you vote Democrat.
I am sorry. I mis-attributed the bee trivialization to be yours.
That COVID death report data is for only two months.
I’m glad we agree on the bee death claim as completely inaccurate and irrelevant.
Man was administered the C-19 vax and NOTHING has happened to him!!! Film at 11:00.
“...copied & pasted material is relevant...”
***********************************
If it’s not relevant why would they put it in their “report”?
Oh, another story from the “Daily Expose” of the UK is your source - now there’s a beacon of credibility.
It is an antivaxx COVID19 conspiracy kook website started in November of last year.
It’s good to know that the impartiality, receptiveness, and erudition of certain old FReepers can still be counted on.
You have no idea, do you?
Come out of the bubble, man. Breathe the fresh air of non-media-polluted freedom.
C’mon. You can do it.
Think past your spike protein activated SARS-CoV-2 fog and join us on the free side.
Is that too much all at once?
You can take it one at a time, if you wish.
What question, exactly, are you asking? You seem to be conflating the scientific community with politicians. Scientists who work for the government are not politicians and are not responsible for policies instituted by politicians. We might try to advise politicians, but have no control over what the politicians might do with our advice. Conversely, the politicians can tell us which research is funded or not, but they can't tell us the results of our research or force us to say the results are other than what the data shows.
So, stop confusing scientists with politicians. We're not the same.
Yes, that was something the paperwork asked to confirm when receiving *both* doses (though it was Moderna, not Pfizer). I’m a guy so it was obviously N/A for me.
We don’t know that she was specifically advised of this, however...if the vaccine was even involved.
Ehn
Oah
NO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.