Replace the word white in the above construct with another human skin color or religion and you'll see the inherent racism in the whole concept.
Example: The heart of your question, JUSTICE, is not whether every Muslim person is bad for the planet. It’s about whether it’s possible to separate Muslim people as individuals from the legacy that Islam-favoring systems have wrought on the world. And that is a very complicated prospect!
I agree with your statement and even just looking at the title of this article if someone would replace white with another color, there would be hell to pay.
It is even easier to understand this person’s perspective by simply substituting the word “Jew” for “white” in every instance where it occurs in the screed. With only minor rewriting, it would be ready for publication in any Nazi newspaper or magazine of the 1930’s.
Not only does it properly identify the author for the self-loathing racist, controlling fascist, and anti-Western communist she is, its mere publication underscores the danger in allowing news media, education, and various levels of government to become dominated by liberal groupthink. It is not just the toxicity of modern liberalism that is the danger but the toxicity of the groupthink producing the desire to conform in order to be accepted into and remain in the group. One has to wonder how many times the draft had to be rewritten to increase the scope and harshness of its anti-white and anti-Western rhetoric.
On this latter point, it might be useful to examine, with necessary caution, the earlier writings of the author to find the inflection point where her commitment to classical liberal ideals like color blind fair treatment for all persons morphed into completely slanted viewpoints presented here.
Islam is NOT a race!
Islam is a political system masquerading as a religion/faith.
Accepting and spreading the myth that disdain for islam is racism also perpetuates many other false accusations and is a form of gaslighting.
You know better!