[Alberta's Child]

With mail-in ballots it’s pretty much mimpossible to prove fraud unless someone comes out and admits that they filled out someone else’s ballot.

[joesbucks]

Signatures. But given that, potential isn’t proof. And to overturn, proof is needed. I think we knew x ballots fell under potential. That’s a lot of money and angst wasted. Unless the goal was to get back door access for future elections.

[RideForever]

With mail-in ballots it’s pretty much mimpossible to prove fraud

... if you don't have a brain. There. Fixed it. The fact is that the ballots in question far exceed the appros 12k difference in the Presidential race. Even if it's possible to pare the number down.