I don’t think GOA or anyone else should be feathering their own nests based on an artificial connection to this young man.
Totally disagree.
I think they did it out of pure motives. What difference does it make NOW!!! He has the rifle and no one can take it away from him, the first ones who tried are dead.
Of course, you don’t. You’re a liberal and despise anything Americans do. You support all the connections liberals do to one another, but this one bugs you.
Oh stop. The leftist and rat groups exult and reward “their heroes” into the stratosphere.
Not so much that they’re ’feathering’ their nest, but that they are celebrating the misfortune of this young man forced to defend himself against multiple mobs.
To give him a copy of the tool he had to use to unwillingly take others lives (righteous, legal, or whatever) as some kind of emblem of pride is questionable at best.
*** I don’t think GOA or anyone else should be feathering their own nests based on an artificial connection to this young man. ***
I agree with you. It was a self defense case at its heart, not a 2A case. The Judge determined early on the weapon, and Kyle’s possession of it were both legal.
You can always be depended upon to urinate on any positive message.
Thank you, Jim Noble, for your incredible consistency! S/
Shouldn’t you be standing in line for your 7th booster?