Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum

I’ll go with a simpler explanation than most on this thread.

The artist didn’t like women disfiguring their faces with “beauty patches” and was saying that they were making themselves look like African tribeswomen.

I feel similarly about young women today disfiguring their bodies with graffiti.


10 posted on 12/12/2021 4:53:22 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SauronOfMordor

“The patterns on their faces marked “a sin of pride,” according to the statement.”
________________________________________________

“The artist didn’t like women disfiguring their faces with “beauty patches” and was saying that they were making themselves look like African tribeswomen.”
_______________________________________________

Your extremely simplistic ‘explanation’ is fraught with error. How did you manage to get your racial explanation????? The ‘Sin of Pride,’ was all the way back in the Garden Of Eden.......

Unless you’re willing to say Eve was the First black woman.....

....by the way....the genetic make-up of every single racial group *was* in Adam, hence would be in Eve..... just a thought.....

The ‘Sin of Pride,’ is in every single racial grouping, however......


17 posted on 12/12/2021 9:07:55 PM PST by Notthereyet (NotThereYet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson