Posted on 12/12/2021 8:51:08 PM PST by ransomnote
While many countries are either voting and threatening to make vaccines mandatory, the UK being one of them, Japan allows individuals to choose whether to be injected with the experimental gene-therapies or not and also labels the vaccines with warnings.
Additives Warnings
Even the additives in the vaccines are highlighted in the vaccines available in Japan. Three Covid-19 gene-therapy treatments are currently offered, they include the Pfizer/BioNTech (Comirnaty) and Takeda’s Moderna formulation. Vaxzevria (formerly AstraZeneca) is also administered but only recommended to people 40-year-old and over.
The product descriptions of Pfizer and Moderna state that: “This product contains an additive that has never been used in a vaccine before,” and reference is also made to the new type of additive in the Vaxzevria injections and Pharmaceutical companies urge individuals to consult their doctors about the additive if they plan to be injected with it.
Informed Consent
This level of transparency came as a result of a meeting held by Japan’s Ministry of Health with a panel of experts on Saturday and concluded that a proposed warning of the risk of taking the vaccine was to be informed by printing “serious side effects” on the documents attached to them.
Not only will they now be warning of the potentially dangerous and deadly risks of the vaccine, but the country is also reinforcing its commitment to ensuring that all possible side effects are reported in its adverse event system.
The country is enforcing strict legal reporting requirements and hospitals are to report in detail any incidents involving individuals who have developed symptoms of side effects within 28 days after being vaccinated, according to the law.
Myocarditis
The Ministry of Health has in particular listed Myocarditis the inflammation of the heart muscle and of the outer lining of the heart, as possible serious side effects of the Moderna and Pfizer COVID vaccines.
Myocarditis has been found to be more prevalent in younger males, as the Expose has also reported (1, 2, 3,) and the Ministry openly reports that as of November 14, out of every one million males who had the Moderna vaccine, such side effects were reported in 81.79 males aged 10 to 19 and 48.76 males in their 20s. The figures were 15.66 and 13.32 respectively for those who had the Pfizer vaccine (source).
No vaccination will be given without consent
Japan’s Ministry of Health of health website encourages citizens to receive the “vaccine”; however, they stress it is not mandatory: “Although we encourage all citizens to receive the COVID-19 vaccination, it is not compulsory or mandatory. Vaccination will be given only with the consent of the person to be vaccinated after the information provided”.
Additionally, the government recommends those who are considering taking the vaccines carefully consider both its effectiveness and side effects: “Please get vaccinated of your own decision, understanding both the effectiveness in preventing infectious diseases and the risk of side effects. No vaccination will be given without consent”.
No Mandates and No Discrimination
Japan has also announced that public and private sectors cannot discriminate against those who refuse the experimental mRNA gene therapy injections. Businesses cannot mandate vaccinations to force their employees to receive the experimental gene therapy and employees are not to discriminate against those who refuse the injections.
“Please do not force anyone in your workplace or those who around you to be vaccinated, and do not discriminate against those who have not been vaccinated”.
The government includes instructions for individuals in the possible event of a complaint, or discrimination at work due to their unvaccinated status and signpost them to “Human Rights Advice.” (source).
It is now unusual to see this level of transparency from a government body concerning the Covid vaccines. This coming week in the UK MPs will vote on whether or not to make vaccines mandatory, so far 60 Tory MPs have vowed to vote against it (see here). However, our decision on whether to be vaccinated or not, should never be questioned, even according to the “pre-pandemic” NHS definition of consent:
Defining consent
For consent to be valid, it must be voluntary and informed, and the person consenting must have the capacity to make the decision.
The meaning of these terms are:
If an adult has the capacity to make a voluntary and informed decision to consent to or refuse a particular treatment, their decision must be respected (NHS)
Japanese authorities are treating their citizens with the respect they deserve, they are being informed of risks and any consent thereafter is of their own choosing. Why is this not the case in the UK and other European countries anymore? We are being subjected to force and to receive a vaccine we do not need, and threats to our freedoms if we do not comply. This in itself should make people hesitant at the very least to take the vaccine.
PING
One thing is certain. The lobbyists for Pfizer and Moderna in Japan have been fired.
The Japanese have been very rational and honest about acknowledging the truly reported complications and benefits regarding the vaccines. This openness and honesty contrasts with the political narrative followed by the FDA and CDC.
Japan has it right.
Yep , it is where I have resided for the past 36 years .
Posting stuff about Japan’s methods about administering the vaccine and also post stuff saying Japan stopped administering vaccines entirely and switched over to all ivermectin treatment only. https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4008842/posts Both of those things obviously cannot be true.
You also post multiple posts about supposedly better alternative treatments for COVID19, then also post articles saying that COVID19 doesn’t even exist. Both of those things obviously cannot be true.
When you care about truth and the facts you don’t have to have a good memory. Just posting random stuff regardless of the facts and the truth appearing on a variety of fake news websites with the only requirement apparently for you being that it paints vaccines in negative light doesn’t accomplish that. This is why you have zero - zero - credibility.
We’re at the point in this ridiculous, political, ever-changing “pandemic” where it’s safe to simply say the Japanese were and are too smart to buy the BS.
Good on ‘em.
It’s Ok: I’m sure he accepts your apology.
I have a brain and can judge for myself.
As do many of us here.
The Japanese don’t need a vaccine because they almost all eat natto. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X21010718
Whom do you imagine logs on to find out what Republican Wildcat thinks of others posting on FR?
People are here to sift through available information and share analysis. They think for themselves. Get over yourself.
RINO wildcat...lol....same one who told us, early on, that these $hots would merely be once/year, “like the flu shot”.
Talk about having ZERO credibility.
Wrong, then. Wrong, now.
Don’t forget your boooo$ter!
You pro vaxxers have no embarrassment, shame or morals.
The pay must be really good.
“Please do not force anyone in your workplace or those who around you to be POISONED, and do not discriminate against those who have not been POISONED”.
Only a fool injects this rat-poison into his body to “stop COVID.”
Sputtering troll is sputtering in defeat.
Kek.
If that is the case could you just take nattokinase supplements?
I do take nattokinase to avoid blood clots. But the food natto has a lot more in it, and I doubt that nattokinase has anti-viral activity.
I have great respect for Japan.
Articles on all sides of an issue are much appreciated so we can read for ourselves and make informed judgements. I, for one, appreciate such a variety of articles from ransomnote.
Do you expect a person to be so dogmatic and rigid as to only post articles from a certain and fixed viewpoint? It would be very boring if we all had a rigid doctrine and only posted articles supporting that doctrine.
What do you have against a variety of viewpoints? Why should a person posting articles that tackle a topic from different perspectives have no credibility?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.