Posted on 02/13/2022 2:48:39 PM PST by ransomnote
Fact Check-The Metropolitan Police has not opened a criminal investigation into Britain's COVID-19 vaccine rollout”
More BS! from Reuters.
Fact Check-Jim Smith, who sits on Pfizer's board, is also former president and current chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, and CEO and director of Reuters parent company, Thomson Reuters Corporation.
He is a Member of the International Business Council of the World Economic Forum, the International Advisory Boards of British American Business and the Atlantic Council. Director of Refinitiv.
https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/board-of-directors/james_smith
Using Reuters for anything other than bird cage liner is like saying Julius Streicher, Founder of and publisher of Der Stürmer vehemently denies the existence of Jewish “camps”
“One only has to look at Theresienstadt as a model of modern relocation policy”
Nice try. Consult your boss on what drivel to shovel next.
”seized an injection vial from the fridge housed in the surgery in which she works and handed it to an independent investigator” - stole a vile from her workplace and gave it to an unnamed “independent investigator” with no chain of custody BTW.
The contents of the injection vials have been forensically examined and a laboratory report has now been officially published. - unnamed lab and the term for this, whatever they were doing, would not be “forensically examined”.
The lab report can be read in full here. - that’s not a lab report.
So to recap – an unnamed “Medical Practitioner” stole a vial from her workplace and gave it to an “independent researcher”, also not named who took it to a lab, also not named who published a lab report that is not a lab report.
Am I missing anything?
Polynikes wrote: “More BS! from Reuters.”
As I reported: “Fact Check-The Metropolitan Police has not opened a criminal investigation into Britain’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout””
And now we have irrelevant BS from you. Who does and does not sit on the Reuters board is irrelevant. If the author can’t get some simple like the existence of this supposed complaint, then the whole article is suspect.
Interesting that they haven't. Case in point, this howler from Politifact...
Scroll down to sources, download the vaxx fact sheets. Check out the weasel wordage on ingredients.
See my above reply.
It is when you use Reuters to add credence to your reply when Reuters is a known compromised source and you know it. Check in with your boss Tony for better replies.
Polynikes wrote: “It is when you use Reuters to add credence to your reply when Reuters is a known compromised source and you know it.”
Just because you think Reuters is a compromised source does not make it so. I think Kennedy jr., Mercola, Malone, etc., are compromised sources.
That the best you can do?. Malone? No hope for you. enjoy the VEI helll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.