Posted on 02/23/2022 4:07:58 AM PST by allen592
Edited on 02/23/2022 5:54:44 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
An Australian man has been convicted of possessing child sex dolls under new laws to combat abuse against minors.
Terry Dunnett, 45, pleaded guilty Wednesday in District Court in Brisbane to two counts of possessing a child sex doll, one count of attempting to possess a child sex doll and possessing child exploitation material, abc.net.au reported.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Just wow.
I thought it was the Bee. Guess not.
Ok, this is horrifying.
On the bottom of one shoe in that pic it says “J. Biden”.
At first, I thought it was the Bee. Very disturbing.
This will be Weird.
I know this is creepy, but it’s just a doll. What’s next? Arresting teenagers who play terrible video games?
No such laws in China, apparently.
At least it was a female.
What’s “horrifying” about it?
It’s a piece of plastic.
Australia is fast becoming a joke.
The guy is sick and needs serious therapy. But he isn’t a criminal. I did hear something about men in the Arab world doing the same thing with lambs.
The guy is sick and needs serious therapy. But he isn’t a criminal. I did hear something about men in the Arab world doing the same thing with lamb dolls.
Thought crimes.
Our adversaries are irrational, emotional, idiots, ruled by their impulses and played for emotional fools.
They rule us by their votes, controlled by the Media, who are also idiots.
People who put Barbie and Ken in sexual situations will now be arrested?
> I know this is creepy, but it’s just a doll. What’s next? Arresting teenagers who play terrible video games?
Exactly.
This is one of those gray areas where a person could reasonably argue either way. This is sick enough behavior, however, where I don’t care as much about the perp’s rights as I do protecting society or fearing government overreach. Someone like this is likely to want the real thing if an opportunity arises. And I don’t think arresting him constitutes a slippery slope where men are arrested for having a barbie doll or something in their possession, since these dolls are clearly designed for sex. But like I said, a person could reasonably argue either way.
Could face 15 years in prison...I remember a similar case in Singapore and it was less than a year jail time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.