Posted on 03/16/2022 9:43:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
From the article:
Why call an experimental gene therapy product a “vaccine”? Dr. Martin believes that there are two basic reasons:
1) to circumvent liability for damages, and
2) if the products were called gene therapy or a similar label, most people would wisely refuse to use them.
It’s heartening that this stuff is getting wider distribution on mainstream platforms, but nothing will come of it.
“IF”? Only by the revised definition.
Chilling.
The has got to be the greatest hoax of the millennium.
The boy is slow, but he do seem to be catching on.
Welcome to January 2021, again...
Good to check dates on source articles before posting.
They ain’t...................
“both Moderna and Pfizer qualify as using illegal deceptive practices by making medical claims without clinic trial proof of immunity and transmission blocking”
Well, that would probably be true, IF the CDC and FDA did not collude with them to alter the definition of the word “vaccine” in their own regulations in order to negate this claim.
Haven’t you heard? They are “highly effective.”
Here is the original source of this...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AuvhMTMoby41/
““IF”? Only by the revised definition.”
You are correct. They could have changed the definition of “vaccine” to include a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Then we could call a peanut and butter sandwich a vaccine.
No GMO anything, anywhere, any time. Except people
Old news, but at least it’s starting to break through the wall of deceit.
Umm... they CHANGED the definition of “vaccine” so they could call it a “vaccine”
That should be all the proof anyone needs.
What it really should be categorized as is a man-made synthetic virus.
"Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."
There is a lot coming out about the clues left for the everyday person to see what the globalist elites have planned for us mongrels (Klaus Schwab)...
Open your minds. The truth is out there to realize, if you are able to accept it...
Ever. Nothing truly global in scope before.
The original source for reverse transcription of “vaccine” RNA to DNA I think was from Harvard or one of the Ivy League schools. At first people were skeptical but the study has been replicated at least two or three times. So yes it likely becomes incorporated into cellular genomes.
But the liability limit is based on a law passed by Congress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.