[SeekAndFind]

From the article:

Why call an experimental gene therapy product a “vaccine”? Dr. Martin believes that there are two basic reasons:

1) to circumvent liability for damages, and

2) if the products were called gene therapy or a similar label, most people would wisely refuse to use them.

[monkeypants]

Welcome to January 2021, again...

Good to check dates on source articles before posting.

[Qiviut]

I believe there is a different FDA process too if something is gene therapy. Pharma & the PTB wanted to bypass all the hoops they would have had to jump through as opposed to a ‘vaccine’.

There was one well-known doctor recently who said the only part of the shots that was “vaccine” was the name ‘vaccine’ attached to them.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Why call an experimental gene therapy product a “vaccine”? Dr. Martin believes that there are two basic reasons:

I will add another...

Doctors genuflect immediately when the word "vaccine" is whispered in their ears... the hair on their arms stands on end... and a shiver goes through their bodies.

[zeugma]

The author of this is way behind the curve on this. We’ve known this for about a year now.