Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Flick Lives
Yes. The real problem is that the further back you go the more languages you find that have no living descendants, and the fewer the written attestations, the harder it is to reconstruct with no parallel languages to look at. Linear A is a good example. Even with the Linear B links to Mycenean Greek sounds, we can't reconstruct the language.

Even with PIE, we can reconstruct that based on its numerous descendants, but with no intermediate forms living or attested in ancient literature, we can't trace its relation to other language groups because there are too many possible sound change permutations to be able to do more than guess about PIE's links to the Semitic or Turkic language groups.

31 posted on 08/02/2022 11:40:07 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15

Interesting stuff.

I think I was confused by the term “linear” thinking it was some family of writing. In a very loose way, I guess it is. Looking up the definition I see “linear” seems to refer to a writing composed of simple lines as opposed to a more pictographic form. Although it’s interesting as I remember one of the stumbling blocks to deciphering hieroglyphics is people thought each symbol was a word instead of a sound. So although pictographic looking, the “picture” was only a sound and not a representation of a thing.


35 posted on 08/02/2022 12:19:07 PM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson