Posted on 08/31/2022 11:03:14 AM PDT by ransomnote
We now have all the CMA Canadian doctor death data in a spreadsheet. It shows that doctors 50 and younger are being killed after the second booster a rate that is 23X normal.
Executive summary
The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) data for 2020 shows doctors in Canada aged 50 and under die at a rate of about 6 per year.
After the latest booster, 6 Canadian doctors, 50 and under, died within a 15 day period.
Something is very wrong here, but nobody wants to talk about it or look into it. They’d rather look the other way.
Introduction
Thanks to the brilliant work of Marc Godard and Brent Kievit-Kylar, we now have the CMA death data that I wrote about earlier in Google spreadsheet format where it can be easily analyzed for the first time. Note that the CMA removed entries prior to 2020 because they said it was too resource intensive to maintain this data. That’s hard to believe, but that’s what they said.
The results are stunning if we look at young doctor deaths: it makes the impact of the vaccines much easier to see because there is more signal and less noise since doctors under 50 rarely die.
We find a 23X increase in the rate of all-cause mortality post-vaccine for Canadian doctors aged 50 and under (compared to the young doctor death rates in 2020).
How can they explain that one?
Well, they can’t.
Those Canadian doctors died after the 2nd booster decades earlier than they should have.
I wanted to talk to the CMA about this, but my request to interview the President of the CMA was ignored. They just don’t want to talk about it. I’m sure they hope nobody sees this article.
So if you are reading this now, you know what to do:
MORE AT LINK: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/doctors-in-canada-are-dying-at-a
PING
Canada killing off their doctors. That’s really going to help their national healthcare.
Anybody that got the jab was a Guinea pig.
So are we, along with non-doctors.
“data for 2020 shows doctors in Canada aged 50 and under die at a rate of about 6 per year.
After the latest booster, 6 Canadian doctors, 50 and under, died within a 15 day period.”
I’m sorry, but this is too small of a sample size to make any relevant conclusions. Kirsch should know better.
maybe instead of another chinaflu jab, the docs might want to have a COMPLETE SYSTEMS CHECK!!!
Oh stop this is all perfectly normal. Ask the pro jab docs in 3...2...1...
Mrs. JimRed had her third booster a few weeks ago. She’s been in the hospital and rehab for a dozen days now. They’re screening her for Parkinsons. Any connection?
Nothing to see here.....move along.
That the CMA has scrubbed all of the earlier data (it had been available back until 2015 until fairly recently) which would provided a much better baseline and has stopped updating should lead one to conclude that “there is nothing to see”
If someone might post the appropriate graphic, I’d be appreciative.
Prayers
Assuming this story is true, and the percentages aren’t manipulated, and there is no agenda, one has to ask what do all these young Drs have in common other than dying young?
It would be safe to assume that most if not all likely graduated at or near the top of their high school, colleges and Med school. So obviously they aren’t stupid.
Other than being from Canada what do they have in common? If ALL the dead ones were Vaxxed, and all the others at the same age who are unvaxxed and are still alive, something could be amiss.
Thank you.
I don’t conclude “there is nothing to see”. That behavior certainly stinks and raises suspicions. But it doesn’t change the basic principles of statistics one bit.
The sample size would be the number of doctors in Canada. What is that number?
“one years worth of deaths in 2 weeks is pretty damning”
Not when you are talking about 6 deaths. It MIGHT be damning, but the sample size is simply too small to make that conclusion. To attempt to do so knowing that the sample size is too small is simply dishonest.
“Hard to imagine that no other people will die the other 50 weeks, that the 2 week period is an anomaly.”
You don’t have to imagine it. You can just wait until the end of the year and see. And then you might have a sufficient sample size to make an accurate and honest conclusion.
sounds good, lets check back at the end of the year
Get on the Frontline Doctors website and look into treatments for the jab.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.