Scott Ritter is a registered sex offender who has been wrong about everything. How stupid do you have to be to still believe this convicted pedophile?
Posted on 09/17/2022 10:04:08 AM PDT by Cathi
Another excellent presentation from my favorite Military Analyst, Scott Ritter. Though this one offers a new twist in the first 1/2 hr. of the program. Ritter passionately answers a question from a viewer about his criminal conviction in great detail and makes clear he is not guilty. Years of appeals that are still in progress.
This is the first time I have seen him address this question.
Since this is a 2:22:47 long video. Do you have the minute mark he talks about the conviction in detail?
It figures this convicted pedo is your favorite “military analyst”.
Somewhere between the 15 min. mark and the 38 min. mark.
He is obviously very angry about this issue. He has said in other programs that once he went against the CIA over the weapons of mass destruction issue the deep state (including Biden who angrily called him “Scotty Boy” because his investigation resulted in embarrassment for them has gone after him nonstop trying to discredit him.
A bit of history here. Not mentioned was when Brandon addressed Maj. Ritter as “Scotty Boy.” Brandon has never been anything but an out of control overgrown frat boy.
Yup.
President-elect Donald Trump’s criticism of the intelligence community over its reports of Russian hacking during the 2016 election has generated a lot of commentary over what is being described as a “feud” between Trump and the intelligence agencies.
Beyond all of the questions about the Russians, their relationship with Trump, their role in the election, etc., there is another element of this story that is also raising very frightening questions about the state of our democracy.
An example of what I’m talking about emerged when Senate Democratic leader Charles Schumer was asked by Rachel Maddow about Trump’s spurning of the agencies’ findings. Trump is “taking these shots, this antagonism, this taunting to the intelligence community,” Maddow pointed out. The response by Schumer—who has been in Congress since 1980, and in the Senate leadership for ten years, and presumably knows his way around Washington—should send a chill through the heart of every American:
Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.
It starts at the 25 minute mark.
The conviction question asked at the 25 minute mark and by the 37 minute mark he answered it really well. I’m convinced it was a bogus conviction. He should get a lot of money when the civil suit is done if he can get the appeal through.
This is the problem with our system. The people working within it can distort and corrupt it at their will all the way through the trial. Not good at all. The people do this should be in prison for life.
He’s guilty. He’s scum. “Years of appeals”?! He got convicted a decade ago. Finished his sentence and everything.
20 years ago I would have laughed at the “The FBI framed me” excuse.
Now, I am not so sure...
Well it wasn’t.
So you can move on to something else ridiculous now.
It’s the same sort of “explanation” he came up with regarding the incidents in the very early 2000s as well.
Amazing a handful of people defend this darling of the media and the far Left around here now.
Yeah. That’s the hilarious part. They set him up twice?! I think if they’d set him up it would have been a lot more time in jail, and maybe a suicide. The kind of BS sentencing he got is a sure sign of legit busts of connected white people.
I guess being a Rashist orc shill must pay, otherwise we wouldn't have so many here.
MAPs anre never guilty of anything.
Just ask them.
Does he go into detail of how much RT pays him?
Scott Ritter is a registered sex offender who has been wrong about everything. How stupid do you have to be to still believe this convicted pedophile?
I don't think I'll follow your lead. I prefer to make my own path. Something less "dramatic".
Opinions vary.
From what I recall of him . He is not a good guy. Something change that I am not aware of?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.