Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mad_as_he$$

The cargo variant was their hedge bet, I thought that was clear. I know they went all in but had the passenger version failed they had a fall back.


9 posted on 10/23/2022 7:34:25 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne

Don’t think I’ve ever heard it put that way. Found this on Wiki:

“In 1965, Joe Sutter was transferred from Boeing’s 737 development team to manage the design studies for the new airliner, already assigned the model number 747.[9] Sutter began a design study with Pan Am and other airlines to better understand their requirements. At the time, many thought that long-range subsonic airliners would eventually be superseded by supersonic transport aircraft.[10] Boeing responded by designing the 747 so it could be adapted easily to carry freight and remain in production even if sales of the passenger version declined.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747

1965 was pretty early in the program so it could be that they considered that too be a hedge. Air cargo was a small business in 65 so if it was a hedge somebody had great vision.


15 posted on 10/23/2022 7:49:42 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (A Veteran you know needs to hear from you today. Even if it's just a: Hey, how you doing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson