Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Vlad0

I am convinced this is true because I don’t think ANY of the pollsters, including Baris or Trafalgar, made an adjustment for those who already voted.

For ex, say you have a voter population of 500,000, but 200,000 vote early. You poll that and get one result. but in November you poll and it looks really good . . . because you have failed to account for the fact that you are polling a remnant of just over half-—but the ones voting the other way have already voted. It will be interesting to see if the pollsters come to this conclusion.


24 posted on 11/09/2022 4:53:29 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: LS

For ex, say you have a voter population of 500,000, but 200,000 vote early. You poll that and get one result. but in November you poll and it looks really good . . . because you have failed to account for the fact that you are polling a remnant of just over half-—but the ones voting the other way have already voted. It will be interesting to see if the pollsters come to this conclusion.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You’re describing what happened in PA where a million early votes were in the barn before the debate.

Another adjacent scenario was 2020 when feds & MSM kept the lid on the laptop from hell

imo neither situation could show up in the polls


34 posted on 11/09/2022 5:20:21 AM PST by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson