Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The Sheriff is correct in questioning the law. Conviction first, punishment later.
1 posted on 12/05/2022 4:04:43 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
I saw the headline, and thought: ,”What a sheriff actually protecting the constitution?”

I don't think the sheriff would have gone after this if it didn't affect him personally.

2 posted on 12/05/2022 4:28:20 AM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
There are few Americans who support 2A more than me (yes,I am from Massachusetts) but I,like many (most?),think that there are some people who should be denied access to firearms...in some cases temporarily,in some permanently. I think that having been indicted for resisting a police officer might qualify for "temporary".

And all you Freepers who cry "no restrictions on gun ownership!" can save it....I've heard it all before.

3 posted on 12/05/2022 4:44:08 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (I Miss Jimmy Carter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

This is just a red flag law variant.

If someone is a threat to themselves or others, they need to be locked up.

And you can be locked up awaiting trial (with bond).


6 posted on 12/05/2022 4:56:32 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Indictment is not conviction. The Sixth Amendment insures a defendant’s right to a speedy trial. Striking down this law might reinforce the Sixth Amendment.


15 posted on 12/05/2022 6:34:07 AM PST by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson