Yesterday there was a story about climate guru’s struggle to explain the near constant temps in the artic for the past 70 years. Last month it was a struggle to explain increasing snow and ice pack.
Now everyone has ‘science’ to support diametrically opposed conclusions & predictions. Sweet!
“But the glaciers are quickly vanishing due to rising temperatures.”
You are supposed to accept on face but it is an outright lie. Some are shrinking, due sublimation and calving, some are growing,etc., but not much has changed in 70 years. Why don’t we make them give their sources instead of allowing them to frame the argument?