Replies

Some time ago I speculated that the underlying elements in Einstein’s equations could be said to indicate that dimensionality and thus the speed of light is an expression of time in a domain of discrete energy (where different points in space are also different points in space-time, which would move time as a force creating dimensionality and not a mundane dimension itself into a sort of ether-like aspect of existence) *** that the implications of the idea for the possibility of true vacuum (dimensionality with no mass) or true hypermass (mass with no dimensionality) lend themselves to innumerable little big bangs rather than one big bang and at the time I predicted that that should give the universe a kinda swiss cheese structure where concentrations of galaxies surrounded large relatively empty areas.

That of course did not match up to what I understood 1980s astronomers were observing of the physical universe so my fun pretty much ended there.

But then such megastructures of clusters of galaxies were observed later.

So that is kinda the background for what I’m to say.

If the universe exists inside a black hole, or if you are observing super massive black holes deemed too large to possibly exist, both can be accounted for to some degree with a little big bang happening after a true hypermass is achieved anywhere in a black hole, for that results in a relatively low energy state suddenly entering a high energy state (mathematical division by zero) with no reason fir that energy to stick around.

In a vacuum this would create matter coalesced from the abundant energy, violently lowering the energy state back down again.

In a black hole the reverse would be true, dimensionality would erupt within the black hole causing it to fluff up, appearing larger, but the substance of the black hole itself would remain everywhere around this dimensionality and its effects would be felt even if it could not be seen.

To an outsider such a black hole would appear larger than it should, inferred from its event horizon, and to a race with our limited understanding, since we infer mass from size even though that may not always be accurate and we just haven’t found that out yet, the black hole seems super massive.

And, yes, in a universe with a black hole we get to potential “it’s turtles all the way down” condition which is very different than my old pondering about a universe that is ultimately in near vacuum rather than near hypermass as in this post.

*** conversely matter is the organization of that discrete energy into structure through forces (including gravity and various nuclear forces) that occupies more dimensionality (volume) than the unstructured energy would possess. ... I postulated that (unimaginatively named) “proto gravity” and “proto time” were not different but characterized by fields with different spin interacting with each other in some kind of dimensional existence below and beyond our space time (the universe being ultimately structured from fewer dimensions, my protos were two dimensional and their spins one, and only falling apart and losing information as more and more dimensions heap up).

... and, no, I was not doing drugs....