Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The Hague Netherlands, where Government can seize farmer’s lands and businesses at will under the guise of Global Warming. Yet when disenfranchised voters in East Ukraine secede, they are war criminals
1 posted on 03/21/2023 5:59:58 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jan_Sobieski

Defending yourself against acts of terrorism resulting in the murder and maiming of innocent men, women, and children is committing war crimes? Only in a twisted libtard world.


2 posted on 03/21/2023 6:05:48 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

This is the current world, it all depends on who and how war crimes are typified


4 posted on 03/21/2023 6:12:58 AM PDT by californian by choice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

The ICC is a tool of the globalist left. Wouldn’t be surprised to see it seek to arrest a future President of the USA for opposing globohomo or discrimination against white people.


5 posted on 03/21/2023 6:17:16 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“Best Practices Manualfor
United Nations – International Criminal Court Cooperation”

Just another United Muslims ... I mean United Nations organization looking for power? Have they ever addressed the “Religion of Peace” about their hobby of killing Christians?


6 posted on 03/21/2023 6:18:33 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski; EinNYC; californian by choice; Socon-Econ; antidemoncrat
The US has actually threatened the ICC in the past:

In 2002, the U.S. Congress passed the American Service-Members' Protection Act (ASPA), which contained a number of provisions, including authorization of the President to "use all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court", and also prohibitions on the United States providing military aid to countries which had ratified the treaty establishing the court.

Donald Trump on the ICC:

So the United States took the only responsible course: We withdrew from the Human Rights Council, and we will not return until real reform is enacted. For similar reasons, the United States will provide no support in recognition to the International Criminal Court. As far as America is concerned, the ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy, and no authority. The ICC claims near-universal jurisdiction over the citizens of every country, violating all principles of justice, fairness, and due process. We will never surrender America’s sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable, global bureaucracy.

7 posted on 03/21/2023 6:22:49 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

8 posted on 03/21/2023 6:26:56 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Russia is not a signatory to it, never having ratified the Hague agreement and thus does not recognize the court’s authority whatsoever, but also the US has already itself destroyed any credibility of the Hague by threatening to arrest its judges if they dared prosecute American troops for Afghani war crimes:

John Bolton also threatened to sanction the Hague for the same. In fact, the US literally passed the “American Service Member Protection Act,” which gives the US the legal right to ‘invade the Hague’ should they prosecute American soldiers.

This authorization led to the act being colloquially nicknamed “The Hague Invasion Act”, as the act allows the President to order U.S. military action, such as an invasion of The Hague, where the ICC is located, to protect American officials and military personnel from prosecution or rescue them from custody.


9 posted on 03/21/2023 6:38:37 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Has the statute of limitations on the NATO attack on Serbia expired?


11 posted on 03/21/2023 7:14:52 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

It’s atheist scumbag Israelis like Rabin and Peres who have boxed Israel into a corner, accepting the ridiculous fiction of an “occupation” via Oslo, instead of confidently and aggressively proclaiming the sovereignty of Israel over all its lands.


12 posted on 03/21/2023 7:20:34 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“Yet when disenfranchised voters in East Ukraine secede...”

Nobody holds a secession vote in the middle of a foreign invasion. You’re beclowning yourself.


13 posted on 03/21/2023 8:52:48 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson