Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Twotone
The fact of the matter is that hiring a double agent is always a risk of the trade. If CIA were so anxious to get a source inside the Islamic militants, it's quite possible they arranged such a meeting, and possibly even acted to get them into the US.

It's also likely that if this blew up in their faces as it appears to have happened, they acted to deep-six any information about it. My understanding from investigations at the time was that CIA did hide info about terrorists infiltrating into the US from the FBI to protect "sources and methods." This was part of the "stove-piping" criticized at the time. Maybe now we know why.

15 posted on 05/05/2023 8:19:31 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15

“My understanding from investigations at the time was that CIA did hide info about terrorists infiltrating into the US from the FBI to protect “sources and methods.” “

That is both true and misleading at the same time.

Dig deeper.


20 posted on 05/05/2023 9:14:32 AM PDT by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson