To respond to your comment, you'll have to make it clearer For me.
(1) I have no idea what "smagletude" means. Pease define, eh?
(2) You used the word "reeking" which is the emission of an odor, something smelly. Is that what you meant? Or did you want to convey the idea of the homophonic word "wreaking" which sounds the same but has a very different meaning?
(3) How does your "electronic device " work? Is it someting that is worn by an individual while continually injecting the intoxicant into a person's blood stream? or is its use based on a multiple of ongoing time-spaced separate injections of the intoxicant. Or is the activation of the devce dependent on the wilful choice of the user? How would that be different than the method of using chewable nicotine=bearing materil formed by mastication to fit along the person's gum where the active but limited amount of the toxin slowly leaches from the chewed mass at thecontact with the person's gum line into the peron's blood vessels? (Two uses of the word "gum" here, the chewed substance as one kind of gum, a "cud"; and the person's dental dermis-covered blood-carrying flesh surrounding the teeth that brings nutrients to the living inner core of the tooth).
(4) Would you please illuminate me the embodiment of your scheme and how it works. Would it be more expensive than just buying the polyacrilex chewable material as a box of individual tablets each of which contains a limited amount of accessible nicotine, and administered only and wholly as the user desires? Andwishes to spend money on?
You’re an idiot, arent you?